SVM Compound Kernel Functions for Vehicle Target Classification
-
Published:2018-09-20
Issue:5
Volume:22
Page:654-659
-
ISSN:1883-8014
-
Container-title:Journal of Advanced Computational Intelligence and Intelligent Informatics
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:JACIII
Author:
Roxas Edison A., ,Vicerra Ryan Rhay P.,Lim Laurence A. Gan,Dadios Elmer P.,Bandala Argel A.
Abstract
The focus of this paper is to explore the use of kernel combinations of the support vector machines (SVMs) for vehicle classification. Being the primary component of the SVM, the kernel functions are responsible for the pattern analysis of the vehicle dataset and to bridge its linear and non-linear features. However, the choice of the type of kernel functions has characteristics and limitations that are highly dependent on the parameters. Thus, in order to overcome these limitations, a method of compounding kernel function for vehicle classification is hereby introduced and discussed. The vehicle classification accuracy of the compound kernel function presented is then compared to the accuracies of the conventional classifications obtained from the four commonly used individual kernel functions (linear, quadratic, cubic, and Gaussian functions). This study provides the following contributions: (1) The classification method is able to determine the rank in terms of accuracies of the four individual kernel functions; (2) The method is able to combine the top three individual kernel functions; and (3) The best combination of the compound kernel functions can be determined.
Publisher
Fuji Technology Press Ltd.
Subject
Artificial Intelligence,Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition,Human-Computer Interaction
Reference27 articles.
1. S. Sivaraman and M. M. Trivedi, “Looking at Vehicles on the Road: A Survey of Vision-Based Vehicle Detection, Tracking, and Behavior Analysis,” IEEE Trans. on Intelligent Transportation Systems, Vol.14, No.4, pp. 1773-1795, 2013. 2. A. R. F. Quiros, R. A. Bedruz, A. C. Uy, A. Abad, A. Bandala, and E. P. Dadios, “Machine vision of traffic state estimation using fuzzy logic,” 2016 IEEE Region 10 Conf. (TENCON), 2016. 3. A. C. P. Uy, A. R. F. Quiros, R. A. Bedruz, A. Abad, A. Bandala, E. Sybingco, and E. P. Dadios, “Automated traffic violation apprehension system using genetic algorithm and artificial neural network,” 2016 IEEE Region 10 Conf. (TENCON), 2016. 4. A. Nag, D. J. Miller, A. P. Brown, and K. J. Sullivan, “Combined Generative-Discriminative Learning for Object Recognition using Local Image Descriptors,” IEEE Workshop on Machine Learning for Signal Processing, 2007. 5. B. Benfold and I. Reid, “Stable Multi-Target Tracking in Real-Time Surveillance Video,” IEEE Conf. on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), 2011.
|
|