Income Inequality and Fertility Behavior: An Empirical Study on China
-
Published:2024-07-20
Issue:4
Volume:28
Page:816-828
-
ISSN:1883-8014
-
Container-title:Journal of Advanced Computational Intelligence and Intelligent Informatics
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:JACIII
Author:
Wu Weicong1, Zhao Xindong1
Affiliation:
1. Institute of Quantitative Economics, School of Statistics, Huaqiao University, No.668 Jimei Avenue, Xiamen, Fujian 361021, China
Abstract
The declining trend in China’s fertility rate is very pronounced, and since 2023, the population has entered a phase of negative growth, significantly constraining economic development. At the same time, income inequality, which creates many problems, remains a serious issue. Existing research does not discuss the impact of income inequality on fertility rates in China currently. This paper depends on both macro and micro perspectives to examine the relationship between income inequality and fertility. We used the macro perspective to study the impact of urban-rural income inequality on the birth rate. The results show that the widening income gap between urban and rural areas will reduce the birth rate, but this effect declines with increasing of the birth rate; this negative effect is the strongest in the eastern region and the weakest in the western region. We used micro perspective to study the effect of the Gini coefficient on fertility motivation. It was found that for every one percent increase of the Gini coefficient, the fertility motivation decreased by about 0.08%, indicating that income inequality also impacts fertility behavior negatively. Comparing different income groups, income inequality has no impact on the fertility motivation of low-income groups, but has a significant negative and positive impact, respectively, on the middle and high-income groups. The mediating effect model shows that income inequality can negatively affect fertility behavior by reducing social trust and subjective well-being. Therefore, the empirical results from China suggest that income inequality negatively affects fertility behavior.
Funder
Huaqiao University Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities
Publisher
Fuji Technology Press Ltd.
Reference40 articles.
1. D. Song, Z. Liu, and Y. Gong, “Influences on the willingness to have the second child of urban residents by housing price’s increasing,” Urban Problems, Vol.2017, No.3, pp. 67-72, 2017 (in Chinese). https://doi.org/10.13239/j.bjsshkxy.cswt.170309 2. T. Omori, “Effects of public education and social security on fertility,” J. of Population Economics, Vol.22, No.3, pp. 585-601, 2009. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00148-009-0244-9 3. F. Kramarz, O. Rosenqvist, and O. N. Skans, “How family background shapes the relationship between human capital and fertility,” J. of Population Economics, Vol.36, No.1, pp. 235-262, 2023. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00148-021-00834-5 4. R. A. Easterlin, “An economic framework for fertility analysis,” Study in Family Planning, Vol.6, No.3, pp. 54-63, 1975. https://doi.org/10.2307/1964934 5. M. B. Micevska, “Economic disruption, Malthusian fertility, and economic growth,” Working Paper, The Brookings Institution and Claremont Graduate University, 2001.
|
|