Author:
Koga Ryosui, ,Aoyama Hideki
Abstract
In the wake of rapid advances in design and production technologies, differentiating products based on their quality has become a challenge. Against this backdrop, design has become an important factor in determining product value. Design is a creative activity influenced by the experience and sensitivity of designers, who are required to understand the preferences and needs of customers and reflect them in their designs. Accordingly, there is a need to efficiently determine customer preferences. Although it is possible to extract customers’ apparent preferences through interviews and questionnaires, these may be arbitrary. Additionally, to respond to the recent diversification of customer preferences, it is not enough to understand apparent preferences; latent preferences must also be extracted. However, they are vague and cannot be expressed in words by the customers. Unfortunately, a practical method for extracting latent preferences has not yet been developed. In this study, we propose a method for extracting latent customer preferences. We develop a system for recommending products that customers are likely to prefer from among existing products, and develop a system for creating original product designs that customers are expected to prefer. We experimentally verify the usefulness of this method.
Publisher
Fuji Technology Press Ltd.
Subject
Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering,Mechanical Engineering
Reference22 articles.
1. T. Nishino, M. Nagamachi, M. Sakawa, K. Kato, and H. Tanaka, “A Comparative Study on Approximations of Decision Class and Rule Acquisition by Rough Sets Model an Application to the Design of Children Shoes,” Kansei Engineering Int., Vol.5, No.4, pp. 51-60, 2006.
2. T. Nishino, M. Nagamachi, and H. Tanaka, “Variable precision Bayesian rough sets model and its application to human evaluation data,” Proc. of Int. Workshop on Rough Sets, Fuzzy Sets, Data Mining, and Granular-Soft Computing, pp. 294-303, 2005.
3. J. Sanui, “Visualization of users’ requirements: Introduction of the Evaluation Grid Method,” Proc. of the 3rd Design and Decision Support Systems in Architecture and Urban Planning Conf., Vol.1, pp. 365-374, 1996.
4. J. Gutman, “A Means-end Chain Model Based on Consumer Categorization Process,” J. of Marketing, Vol.46, pp. 60-72, 1982.
5. Y. Motumura and T. Kanade, “Quantitative Modeling for Personal Construct and Probabilistic Reasoning,” Technical Report of IEICE, NC2004-119, pp. 25-30, 2005.