Author:
Narita Hirohisa, ,Fujimoto Hideo
Abstract
The algorithm we propose calculates the environmental burden due to machine tool operations. The environmental burden analyzer we then developed determines the environmental impact of dry machining, minimum quantity lubricant (MQL) machining, and wet machining on the impact categories of global warming, acidification, eutrophication, photochemical oxidants, human toxicity, and ecotoxicity. We explain the features of impact categories as they relate to machining operations and discuss machining methods for lower the environmental burden of machine tool operations.
Publisher
Fuji Technology Press Ltd.
Subject
Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering,Mechanical Engineering
Reference15 articles.
1. H. Yoshimura, K. Niwa, T. Nakamura, and F. Itoigawa, “Study on Eco-Friendly Oil on Drop Cutting Fluid (Water Properties and Machining Performance of Oil on Water Drop Cutting Fluid),” Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Leading Edge Manufacturing in 21st Century (LEM21), pp. 1059-1063, 2003.
2. M. Shimoda, “LCA case of machine tool,” Symposium of 2002 Japan Society for Precision Engineering Spring Annual Meeting “Leading-Edge Trend of Environmental Impact Evaluation for Inverse Type Design and Manufacturing,” pp. 37-41, 2000 (in Japanese).
3. S. Touma, S. Ohmori, K. Kokubo, and M. Tateno, “Evaluation of Environmental Burden in Eco-friendly Machining Method using Life Cycle Assessment Method -- Estimation of Carbon Dioxide Emission in Eco-friendly Turing Method --,” J. of JSPE, Vol.69, No.6, pp. 825-830, 2003 (in Japanese).
4. J. Akbari, K. Oyamada, and Y. Saito, “LCA of Machine Tools with Regard to Their Secondary Effects on Quality of Machined Parts,” Proc. of Eco Design 2001, pp. 347-352, 2001.
5. P. Sheng, D. Bennet, S. Thurwachter, and B. F. von Turkovich, “Environmental-Based Systems Planning for Machining,” Annals of the CIRP, Vol.47/1, pp. 409-414, 1998.
Cited by
18 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献