Quantification, Persistence, and Status of Dodine Resistance in New York and Michigan Orchard Populations of Venturia inaequalis

Author:

Köller W.1,Wilcox W. F.1,Jones A. L.2

Affiliation:

1. Department of Plant Pathology, Cornell University, New York State Agricultural Experiment Station, Geneva 14456

2. Department of Botany and Plant Pathology, Michigan State University, East Lansing 48824

Abstract

Isolates of Venturia inaequalis were sampled from apple orchards during 1990 to 1996 and isolate sensitivities to dodine were determined by testing the relative growth (RG) of mycelial colonies at a discriminatory dose of 0.2 μg ml-1. Sensitivities were not significantly different for a wild-type population and several populations sampled from orchards never or rarely treated with dodine, and respective data were combined to provide a reference for baseline populations. The baseline sensitivity was compared with sensitivities determined for four orchards with evidence for practical dodine resistance. At these sites, increases of phenotype frequencies were most pronounced for isolates with RG values >90; they had increased from a baseline level of 0.9 to >30% and, therefore, were rated dodine-resistant. For two orchards with confirmed cases of previous dodine resistance, frequencies of resistant isolates had declined to 11 and 14% after dodine use was discontinued for 13 and 4 years, respectively. Sensitivities had not returned to baseline levels, and indirect evidence suggested that practical dodine resistance could recur rapidly in response to resumed dodine usage. Monitoring of commercial orchards in New York and Michigan revealed that dodine sensitivities were not uniform throughout regions where dodine resistance was widespread in the late 1970s. Sensitivities ranged from baseline to dodine-resistant and appeared to reflect the dodine use history at particular sites. Because the history of dodine use is not always known to growers, applications of dodine remain risky when accurate historical records are not available.

Publisher

Scientific Societies

Subject

Plant Science,Agronomy and Crop Science

Cited by 35 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3