Effect of sampling time, quantification method and tree sample pooling on Phytophthora cinnamomi root quantities in South African avocado orchards

Author:

Jolliffe Jenna B.1,Dann Elizabeth Kathryn2,Van Der Rijst Marieta3,Masikane Siyethemba L.4,Novela Precious5,Mohale Phillemon6,McLeod Adèle7

Affiliation:

1. Stellenbosch University Faculty of AgriSciences, 151679, Stellenbosch, Western Cape, South Africa;

2. University of Queensland, Queensland Alliance for Agriculture and Food Innovation, Ecosciences Precinct, 41 Boggo Rd, Dutton Park, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia, 4102, , ;

3. Agricultural Research Council Infruitec Nietvoorbij, 111657, Biometry Division, Stellenbosch, Western Cape Province, South Africa;

4. Stellenbosch University Faculty of AgriSciences, 151679, Plant Pathology , Stellenbosch, Western Cape, South Africa;

5. Burtie van Zyl, Mooketsi, South Africa;

6. Bertie van Zyl , Mooketsi, South Africa;

7. University of Stellenbosch, Plant Pathology, Private Bag X1, Matieland, Stellenbosch, Western Cape, South Africa, 7602, , ;

Abstract

Phytophthora cinnamomi is a destructive soilborne pathogen causing Phytophthora root rot on avocados worldwide. Little is known about the effect of time of root sampling, root quantification method (quantitative real-time PCR [qPCR]) versus baiting) and tree sample pooling strategies, on the quantification of the pathogen in roots in avocado orchard trees. This was investigated in six avocado orchards in two climatically different production regions (Mooketsi and Letaba) in the Limpopo Province, South Africa, over a two-year period. Two different tree sample pooling strategies, consisting of either a four-pooled-group (four groups each containing five pooled trees) or a single-pooled-group (20 trees pooled) per one-hectare, were both shown to be suitable for quantifying P. cinnamomi in tree roots using qPCR or root baiting. Phytophthora cinnamomi root quantities from the two tree sample pooling strategies were significantly correlated for both quantification methods. Both quantification methods were suitable for quantifying the pathogen in roots, although qPCR was superior to root baiting at identifying significant differences in P. cinnamomi quantities among root sampling time points. The effect of time of sampling was dependent on the investigated year. In 2017, root quantities, which were only evaluated using qPCR, did not reveal a consistent trend of a specific sampling time yielding the highest root quantities for most of the orchards. However, in 2018, five of the orchards, based on the qPCR analyses, contained significantly higher P. cinnamomi root quantities in May (late autumn) than in March (early autumn), August (late winter), and October/November (late spring). In 2018, P. cinnamomi root DNA quantities were significantly positively correlated with the number of soil temperature hours at 20-24°C and 20-29°C two months preceding the root sampling dates, and negatively correlated with the number of hours at 15-19°C two months preceding to root sampling. Our study has identified P. cinnamomi root quantification methods and tree sample pooling strategies which will be useful for understanding the biology of the pathogen and when disease management strategies should be in place.

Publisher

Scientific Societies

Subject

Plant Science,Agronomy and Crop Science

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3