The OSCE and EU Actions towards Georgian Separatist Conflicts: the Case of South Ossetia.

Author:

Vielmini Fabrizio1

Affiliation:

1. Ricercatore del programma Eurasia - Isag

Abstract

Both the OSCE and the EU got involved in the management of the Georgian-South Ossetian conflict considering it as a testing ground for their capacities to act as security actors and easier to deal with in comparison with the other unsolved confrontations in the Post-Soviet area. By this way, they disregarded the root causes of the conflict and then proved unable to deploy the necessary resources to respond to the security expectations of the two sides, especially since the regional geopolitical environment switched from cooperation to confrontation between Russia and an expanding NATO presence. Following the 2008 War, the EU is left as the only mediating player on the ground but is not recognised as such by the SO side supported by Russia while Georgia has thwarted the possibilities of conflict resolution adopting a punitive ‘Occupied Territories’ narrative.

Publisher

Edizioni Ca' Foscari

Reference55 articles.

1. Regional Organizations and Secessionist Entities: Analysing Practices of the EU and the OSCE in Post-Soviet Protracted Conflict Areas

2. BBC (2008), “OSCE ‘failed’ in Georgia Warnings”, November 8; http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/europe/7717169.stm

3. Broers Lawrence, A. Iskandaryan and S. Minasyan (2015), “Introduction: the unrecognized politics of de facto states in the post-Soviet space”, Yerevan: Caucasus Institute, 5-16.

4. Broers Lawrence (2013), “Recognising politics in unrecognised states: 20 years of enquiry into the de facto states of the South Caucasus” Caucasus Survey, 1 (1), October, 59-74.

5. Broers Lawrence (2018), “The South Caucasus: Fracture without end?” in A. Ohanyan, (ed.), Russia Abroad. Driving Regional Fracture in Post-Communist Eurasia and Beyond, Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press, 81-102.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3