Affiliation:
1. Università Ca’ Foscari Venezia, Italia
Abstract
The capture of Beijing by Nationalist forces in June 1928 marked the beginning of a new phase in Sino‑Japanese relations, as political developments in China impacted on issues such as treaty revision and Japan’s interests in the Northeast. Although negotiations did not bring a solution to those fundamental questions, there was some diplomatic progress that, one year later, led to Tokyo’s recognition of the Nanjing government. How did the Japanese press respond to this process? To provide a baseline for broader surveys, this essay compares the stances of the two largest newspapers, considering their assessment of both domestic and foreign factors. The analysis shows that the Asahi and the Mainichi differed to a significant degree in their respective interpretations of the facts.
Publisher
Fondazione Università Ca’ Foscari
Reference179 articles.
1. Newspapers
2. Note: the transcription of article titles uses characters in the standard simplified form. “Ed.” stands for editorial.
3. Ōsaka Asahi shinbun 大阪朝日新聞 (digital database: Asahi shinbunsha 朝日新聞社. Kikuzō II Bijuaru 聞蔵 II ビジュアル. https://database.asahi.com/index.shtml)
4. 1928
5. 4.12. Ed. “Shina hōjin no fuan: tsui ni Manshū ni oyobu” 支那邦人の不安 終に満州に及ぶ [Insecurity of Our Nationals in China: Finally It Reaches Manchuria].