Affiliation:
1. Università di Pisa, Italia
Abstract
The essay reconsiders the well-known problem of the platonic interpretations ofOd.11.601-603, concerning Heracles’ εἴδωλον. Starting with a detailed description of the interpretive problems traditionally raised by the Homeric passage, the article provides an accurate analysis of Plutarch’s and Plotin’s different approaches to Heracles’ myth and to the eschatological concepts involved. The common rationalising surface hides deep conflicts inside the Platonic tradition. The cultural appropriation of the Homeric texts depends therefore to a large extent on the deliberate manipulation and misunderstanding of its original meaning.
Subject
Literature and Literary Theory,Classics
Reference46 articles.
1. Algra 2018 = K. Algra, Arius Didymus as a Doxographer of Stoicism: Some Observations, in J. Mansfeld, D.T. Runia (eds.), Aëtiana IV. Papers of the Melbourne Colloquium on Ancient Doxography, Leiden-Boston 2018, 53-102
2. Andersen 2012 = Ø. Andersen, Older heroes and earlier poems. The case of Heracles in the ‘Odyssey’, in Id., D.T.T. Haug (eds.), Relative Chronology in Early Greek Epic Poetry, Cambridge (UK) 2012, 138-151
3. Baltes 2000 = M. Baltes, La dottrina dell’anima in Plutarco, Elenchos 21, 2000, 245-270
4. Blumenthal 1992 = H.J. Blumenthal, Pronouns, dead persons and some Neoplatonists, LCM 17.4, 1992, 64
5. Bonazzi 2010 = M. Bonazzi, Plutarque et l’immortalité de l’âme, in X. Brouillette, A. Giavatto (eds.), Les dialogues platoniciens chez Plutarque. Stratégies et méthodes exégétiques, Leuven 2010, 75-89