Manager's Decision-Making Styles: A Case Study On Family Enterprises

Author:

Karademir Ömer1ORCID,Tutar Hasan2ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Kastamonu Üniversitesi

2. BOLU ABANT İZZET BAYSAL ÜNİVERSİTESİ

Abstract

The personality traits of the managers, their perception styles, management approaches and the way they evaluate the events can affect their decision-making styles. However, it is known that managers generally prefer one of the intuitive or rational decision forms in the management process. This study aimed to examine managers' decision-making behaviors within the rationality and heuristics framework. The research is designed as a case study, one of the qualitative research designs, as it aims to examine the decision-making styles of the managers in family businesses and which rational or intuitive decision-making style they prefer. The research sample was determined according to the purposive sampling technique and includes 19 family business managers. Research data were collected from 19 family business managers operating in different fields with the help of a semi-structured interview form. The collected data were analyzed according to qualitative content analysis. According to the research findings, managers use all rational, limited rational or intuitive decision-making types in their decision processes. Participants stated that the conjuncture and their way of evaluating events determine the decision-making process. The research results show that perceiving and evaluating the conditions in the decision-making process affects the decision-making process. This result shows that decisions are made depending on the perception of events and personality traits. This situation is critical because it shows that decisions are made according to factual/rational processes and subjective and perceptual processes

Publisher

Kahramanmaras Sutcu Imam Universitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi

Reference60 articles.

1. Altman, M. (2017). A bounded rationality assessment of the new behavioral economics.

2. In Frantz, R., Chen, Shu-Heng, Dopfer, K., Heukelom, F. & Mousavi, S. (Eds.). Routledge Handbook of Behavioral Economics. (179-193) New York, NY: Routledge.

3. Ayyıldız Ünnü, N.A. (2012), Örgütsel bağlamda karar verme eylemi ve dinamikleri: Türkiye için bir model önerisi, (PhD Thesis). Ege University.

4. Baldacchino, L., Ucbasaran, D., Cabantous, L. & Lockett A. (2015). Entrepreneurship research on intuition: A Critical analysis and research agenda. International Journal of Management Reviews, 17(2), 212-231. Doi:10.1111/ijmr.12056.

5. Başkale, H. (2016). Nitel araştırmalarda geçerlik, güvenirlik ve örneklem büyüklüğünün belirlenmesi, Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi Hemşirelik Fakültesi Elektronik Dergisi, 9(1)0, 23-28.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3