Affiliation:
1. Donetsk Law Institute of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Ukraine
Abstract
The relevance of the study is determined by the ambiguity of the interpretation of the concept of “stress resistance”, as a result of which there are difficulties in providing assistance to persons suffering from extremely difficult situations. The purpose of the study is to provide the author's interpretation of the category “personality stress”, which summarises the various definitions. To achieve this goal, the author relies on a methodology of a systematic approach that provides clarity in the understanding of the studied category, order and the ability to summarise research information that existed in the form of disparate elements of the disclosure of something more holistic. The author's definition of stress resistance as a complex integrative systemic property of personality, where the components of its structure (psychophysiological, emotional, cognitive, volitional) are in a certain ratio and form a holistic structure – a stable internal organisation that determines the quality and development of the system. It has been found that different definitions of the term are used in relation to the conditions of stress and areas of mental personality. It is confirmed that vitality is used to denote the adaptive properties of a person who overcomes extremely difficult living conditions. It is substantiated that stress resistance in extreme conditions indicates physiological endurance and depends on the skills of self-regulation to restore homeostasis in life-threatening situations. It is noted that the term “resilience” is better used in difficult communication, which violates the emotional balance of the individual. It is stated that spiritual stability determines the strength of will of a person seeking freedom. The practical value of the research is that the scientific developments on the subject matter have received a clear structural and systemic basis, which makes provision for opportunities to more objectively and holistically approach the solution of problems related to stress
Publisher
Mukachevo State University
Reference26 articles.
1. Hartman, H. (1951). Ego psychology and the problem of adaptation. In D. Rapaport (Ed.), Organization and pathology of thought: Selected sources (pp. 362-396). New York: Columbia University Press.
2. Freud, Z. (1998). Introduction to psychoanalysis. Kyiv: Osnovy.
3. Lazarus, R.S., & Folkman, S. (1984). Stress, appraisal and coping. New York: Springer.
4. Selye, H. (1987). From dream to discovery: How to become a scientist. Moscow: Progress.
5. Kohut, O.O. (2021). Psychology of personality stress. Kryvyi Rih: Literia.
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献