Abstract
This paper explores the mechanism and boundary conditions for the effect of matching anthropomorphized brand image and individual power perception on consumers’ purchasing intention. Using a Stereotype Content Model, this paper divides brand anthropomorphism into warmth-related and competence-related anthropomorphized images and adopts different methods to activate consumers’ power perception for discussion and verification. The results of the three experiments show that consumers with low power perception prefer warmth-related anthropomorphized brands while those with higher power perception lean towards competence-related ones. Matching high (low) power perception and types of anthropomorphism is mediated by an exchange relationship (communal relationship). The above effects exist only in the context of low perceived risk. When perceived risk is high, regardless of power perception, consumers all prefer competence-related anthropomorphized brands. This paper is of theoretical and practical significance as it not only enriches the research into brand anthropomorphism, but also provides guidance for tailoring strategies of brand anthropomorphism.
Publisher
Darcy & Roy Press Co. Ltd.
Reference45 articles.
1. M. Delbaere, E. F. Mcquarrie, B. J. Phillips: Personification in advertising using a visual metaphor to trigger anthropomorphism, Journal of Advertising, (2011) No.40, p. 121-130.
2. S. Fournier, C. Alvarez: Brands as relationship partners: warmth, competence, and in-between, Journal of Consumer Psychology, (2011) No.22, p.177-185.
3. M. Puzakova, H. Kwak, J. F. Rocereto: Pushing the envelope of brand and personality: Antecedents and moderators of anthropomorphized brands, Advances in Consumer Research, (2009) No.36, p.413-420.
4. J. D. Hur, M. Koo, W. Hofmann: When temptations come alive: how anthropomorphism undermines self-control, Journal of Consumer Research, (2015), No.42, p.340-358.
5. S. Kim, R. P. Chen, K. Zhang: Anthropomorphized helpers undermine autonomy and enjoyment in computer games, Journal of Consumer Research, (2016) No.43, p.282-302.