Abstract
When high-stakes examinations are utilised to sort students into different tracks, and determine who is eligible to pursue higher education, teachers typically respond by ensuring incentivised success with the policy hand they are dealt with, that is, by ensuring that the students are incentivised to succeed. Formative assessments provide an opportunity to identify areas where students need additional support and adjust instruction accordingly. They also allow students to develop and demonstrate the skills required to succeed in higher education. Reform efforts are primarily commendable. However, these are merely preliminary steps towards achieving authentic holistic assessment forms. This article reviews the literature on formative assessment in China and the gaokao reform policies, intending to add sociocultural factors to discussions relating to the implementation barriers and gaps. This article seeks to provide insights into formative assessment practices in the Chinese educational context and contribute to the international literature on learning-oriented assessment. The article argues that the 'top-down' system is ineffective in shifting the exam culture and result-oriented mindset and understanding the role of feedback and formative assessment more deeply. Much effort should be made to assist teachers-in-service in developing assessment literacy and grant teachers’ greater autonomy to transform teacher-centred pedagogy into a student-centred one.
Publisher
Darcy & Roy Press Co. Ltd.
Reference29 articles.
1. Tan, C., Koh, K., & Choy, W. The education system in Singapore. Asian Education Systems, 2016, 129–148.
2. Liang, Z.-Y., Zhang, M., Huang, F., Kang, D., & Xu, L. Application Innovation of Educational Measurement Theory, Method, and Technology in China’s New College Entrance Examination Reform. Chinese/English Journal of Educational Measurement and Evaluation, 2021, 2(1).
3. Luo, J., & Chan, C. K. Twenty years of assessment policies in China: A focus on assessing students’ holistic development. International Journal of Chinese Education, 2023, 12(2).
4. Wang, Q. Reform of the English Component in the Gaokao. International Higher Education, 2022, 110, 19–20. https://ejournals.bc.edu/index.php/ihe/article/view/14985.
5. You, Z., & Hu, Y. Walking a Policy Tightrope: The Dilemma of Balancing Diversification and Equality in Chinese College Entrance Examination Reform. Higher Education Policy, 2013, 26(3), 309–324.