Abstract
This systematic review undertook a comprehensive investigation into the intricate relationship between empathy deficits and individuals exhibiting psychopathic traits. Three primary objectives guided our analysis, each addressing a notable gap in the current research landscape: (1) To discern variations in empathy deficits among distinct psychopathic subtypes, (2) To rigorously analyze the predictive correlation between empathy deficits and the propensity to reoffend in individuals with psychopathy, and (3) To thoroughly examine the multifaceted factors influencing empathy within this complex population. This systematic review makes a significant contribution to existing research by addressing critical gaps in our understanding of psychopathy and empathy. By pinpointing the distinct empathy profiles of psychopathic subtypes, predicting the risk of reoffending based on empathy impairments, and offering insights into the contextual nature of empathy, this review bridges crucial knowledge gaps. These findings hold immense significance for the development of more empathetic approaches to both research and clinical practices, striving to improve interactions and rehabilitative efforts for individuals exhibiting psychopathic traits.
Publisher
Darcy & Roy Press Co. Ltd.
Reference15 articles.
1. Hare, R. D. The Hare Psychopathy Checklist-Revised. Multi-Health Systems, 1991.
2. Cleckley, H. The Mask of Sanity: An Attempt to Clarify Some Issues about the So-Called Psychopathic Personality. Mosby, 1941.
3. Blair, R. J. The amygdala and ventromedial prefrontal cortex: functional contributions and dysfunction in psychopathy. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 2007, 362(1487): 1889-1900.
4. Anderson, N. E., & Kiehl, K. A. The psychopath magnetized: Insights from brain imaging. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 2014, 18(2): 52-60.
5. Decety, J., & Moriguchi, Y. The empathic brain and its dysfunction in psychiatric populations: implications for intervention across different clinical conditions. BioPsychoSocial Medicine, 2007, 1(1): 22.