Comparative Efficacy of bDMARDs and tsDMARDs for the Treatment of Rheumatoid arthritis: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis

Author:

Shi Penghua,Wang Li,He Jiafang,Lu Yun

Abstract

To compare the relative clinical efficacy of biologic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (bDMARDs) and targeted synthetic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (tsDMARDs) (adalimumab, infliximab, certolizumab pegol, golimumab, tocilizumab, sarilumab, tofacitinib, baricitinib, upadacitinib, peficitinib, filgotinib, abatacept, anakinra, rituximab) in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) who had been treated with conventional synthetic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (csDMARDs) without adequate response by network meta-analysis. The computer comprehensively searched PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, China Knowledge Network (CNKI), Chinese Biomedical Literature Database (CBM), Wanfang, and VIP databases for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of bDMARDs and tsDMARDs in the treatment of RA. The search time limit was set from the establishment of the databases to February 18, 2023. The quality assessment of the included studies was performed using the Cochrane Collaboration’s tool, and the R software (version 4.1.3) calling the gemtc package (version 1.0-1) in conjunction with JAGS software was for data analysis. Efficacy outcomes included American College of Rheumatology 20%, 50%, 70% response (ACR20, ACR50, ACR70). The included 68 RCTs, totaling 32356 patients with RA were analyzed. There were 68, 64 and 63 studies reported the outcomes of ACR20, ACR50, and ACR70 respectively. The result showed that fifteen drugs all had significant difference compared with placebo. According to the SUCRA values, certolizumab pegol had the highest probability of becoming the best intervention in ACR20 and ACR50, and etanercept was ranked first in ACR70, followed by certolizumab pegol. In conclusion, bDMARDs and tsDMARDs were all effective in improving signs and symptoms in RA patients who had been treated with csDMARDs without adequate response. Certolizumab combined with csDMARDs had better performance on efficacy compared with other interventions.

Publisher

Darcy & Roy Press Co. Ltd.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3