Abstract
Introduction: The method of assessing causality between adverse events and suspect drugs is the most challenging task in pharmacovigilance. It requires attentive consideration of both the adverse events and suspect drugs, patient-related factors, and co-suspect drugs and other medical conditions of the patient.
Objectives: This review aimed to look for different methods available or reported for causality assessment and give a brief comparison between the methods.
Methods: Many pieces of literature were reviewed to present a summary of commonly used important methods for causality assessment.
Results: Though different methods were developed to assess causality, no single method has been proved to produce an accurate or authentic ascertainable evaluation of the causal relationship.
Conclusions: Hence, causality assessment has become an important step in evaluating drug safety. Due to a lack of uniformity, reliability, and rationality, no single method can be accepted as a standard one across the world.
Publisher
Global Pharmacovigilance Society
Reference19 articles.
1. Arimone, Y., Bégaud, B., Miremont-Salamé, G., Fourrier-Réglat, A., Molimard, M., Moore, N., & Haramburu, F. (2006). A new method for assessing drug causation provided agreement with experts' judgment. Journal of clinical epidemiology, 59(3), 308–314.
2. Bégaud, B., Evreux, J. C., Jouglard, J., & Lagier, G. (1985). Imputabilité des effets inattendus ou toxiques des médicaments. Actualisation de la méthode utilisée en France [Imputation of the unexpected or toxic effects of drugs. Actualization of the method used in France]. Therapie, 40(2), 111–118.
3. Benichou, C., Danan, G. (1992). Causality assessment in the European pharmaceutical industry: presentation of the preliminary results of a new method. Drug Information Journal, 26(4), 589-592.
4. Curtin, F., & Schulz, P. (2011). Assessing the benefit: risk ratio of a drug--randomized and naturalistic evidence. Dialogues in clinical neuroscience, 13(2), 183–190.
5. Danan, G., & Benichou, C. (1993). Causality assessment of adverse reactions to drugs--I. A novel method based on the conclusions of international consensus meetings: application to drug-induced liver injuries. Journal of clinical epidemiology, 46(11), 1323–1330.
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献