Abstract
Background: Traditional agricultural systems in Mesoamerica are adaptations of ancient farmers to the complex and varied environments. Tezcalera represents one of them.
Questions: How is the environmental context under which the tezcalera develop? Which management practices are followed in tezcalera? How do these management practices affect weeds' richness, composition, and abundance? How do these management practices contribute to the resilience of the agricultural system, the tropical dry forests, and to the maintenance of subsistence resources?
Studied species: Weeds growing in tezcaleras with different management.
Study site and dates: Zumpahuacán, State of México, 2020-2021
Methods: Twenty-four collaborators were interviewed about the environmental, technological, and cultural aspects of tezcalera. We recorded weeds' richness, composition, and abundance in seven plots with different management histories.
Results: Tezcaleras originate from the slash-burn process and follow different paths: tlacolol-milsol-shallow plot, potrero, and recently, Agave crop. We recorded 161 morphospecies from 45 botanical families; 95 % were native to tropical dry forests. Twenty-five species are endemic to the Balsas region, and thirty-four are at risk. Richness and abundance varied between tezcaleras, where tlacolol plots exhibited the highest values. Plant composition was similar; 65 % had intangible or tangible values.
Conclusions: Tezcalera is a biocultural unit and a resilient agroecosystem. Traditional practices remain and positively impact the richness and composition of native weeds. The uncontrolled use of herbicides and the introduction of Agave crop are displacing traditional crops and modifying traditional practices, risking local agrobiodiversity.
Publisher
Botanical Sciences, Sociedad Botanica de Mexico, AC
Reference54 articles.
1. Acuña R. 1986. Relaciones Geográficas del Siglo XVI. Tomo Segundo. México. Distrito Federal, México: Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México. ISBN impreso 968-837-596-9
2. Albuquerque UP, Ales RM, Farias LR, Machado E. 2014a. Selection of research participants. In: Albuquerque UP, Vital FL, Farias LR, Romeu R. eds, Methods and Techniques in Ethnobiology and Ethnoecology. New York: Humana Press. Springer Protocols Handbooks. pp. 1-15. ISSN 1949-2448
3. Albuquerque UP, Ales RM, Farias LR, Machado E. 2014b. Methods and techniques used to collect ethnobiological data. In: Albuquerque UP, Vital FL, Farias LR, Romeu R. eds, Methods and Techniques in Ethnobiology and Ethnoecology. New York: Humana Press. Springer Protocols Handbooks. pp. 15-37. ISSN 1949-2448
4. Alexiades MN. 1996. Collecting ethnobotanical data: An introduction to basic concepts and techniques. In: Alexiades MN. ed, Selected Guidelines for Ethnobotanical Research: A Field Manual. Bronx, New York: The New York Botanical Garden. pp. 53-94.
5. Altieri MA, Merrick LC. 1987. In situ conservation of crop genetic resources through maintenance of traditional farming systems. Economic Botany 41: 86-96.