Abstract
Background: Seedling establishment depends on the quality of the seeds and environmental conditions. Differential biomass allocation in emergent seedlings probably constitutes a relevant adaptive response of populations along environmental gradients.
Questions: Are there differences in seed mass and biomass allocation in seedlings among Prosopis laevigata populations? Is this variation correlated with environmental variables?
Studied species: Prosopis laevigata (Humb. & Bonpl. ex Willd.) M.C.Johnst (Fabaceae).
Study site and dates: Thirteen localities along the distribution of P. laevigata in México. From 2016 to 2020.
Methods: Seeds were collected from four or five mother trees per locality. Seed mass (SM) was obtained in ten seeds per mother and six functional traits indicative of biomass allocation were measured in the seedlings after 10 days of germination. Population mean values were obtained for the six traits plus SM and subjected to a principal component analysis (PCA). Population scores on the first two axis of the PCA were regressed against environmental variables from the collection localities using a stepwise regression model.
Results: Populations displayed functional variation congruent with alternative biomass allocation strategies. The conservative strategy was characterized by larger seeds and seedlings with denser tissues and a higher investment in root biomass, while the opposite characterized the acquisitive strategy. Actual evapotranspiration in May, isothermality and soil water content in February were environmental variables that significantly predicted population scores on the first two axes of the PCA.
Conclusion: Water availability gradients influence seed mass and seedling biomass allocation variation among P. laevigata populations.
Publisher
Botanical Sciences, Sociedad Botanica de Mexico, AC
Reference71 articles.
1. Ackerly DD, Dudley SA, Sultan SE, Schmitt J, Coleman JS, Linder CR, Sandquist DR, Geber MA, Evans AS, Dawson TE, Lechowicz MJ. 2000. The Evolution of Plant Ecophysiological Traits: Recent Advances and Future Directions: New research addresses natural selection, genetic constraints, and the adaptive evolution of plant ecophysiological traits. BioScience 50 :979-995. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1641/0006-3568(2000)050[0979:teopet]2.0.co;2
2. Adler PB, Salguero-Gómez R, Compagnoni A, Hsu JS, Ray-Mukherjee J, Mbeau-Ache C, Franco M. 2014. Functional traits explain variation in plant life history strategies. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 111: 740-745. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1315179111
3. Akaike H. 1974. A new look at the statistical model identification. IEEE 19 :716-723. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/TAC.1974.1100705
4. Ansley RJ, Boutton TW, Jacoby PW. 2007. Mesquite root distribution and water use efficiency in response to long-term soil moisture manipulations. In: Sosebee RE, Wester DB, Britton CM, McArthur ED, Kitchen SG, eds. Proceedings: Shrubland dynamics - fire and water. Proccedings RMRS-P-47. Fort Collins, CO: Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, pp. 96-103.
5. Barak RS, Lichtenberger TM, Wellman-Houde A, Kramer AT, Larkin DJ. 2018. Cracking the case: Seed traits and phylogeny predict time to germination in prairie restoration species. Ecology and Evolution 8: 5551-5562. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.4083
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献