Standardization of indoor radon measurements based on rational criterion for conformity assessment

Author:

Tsapalov A. A.1ORCID,Kiselev S. M.2ORCID,Kovler K. L.3ORCID,Miklyaev P. S.4ORCID,Petrova T. B.5,Zhukovsky M. V.6ORCID,Yarmoshenko I. V.6ORCID,Marennyy A. M.7ORCID,Tutelyan O. E.8,Kuvshinnikov S. I.8

Affiliation:

1. Scientific Production Company «Doza», Ltd

2. State Research Center – A. Burnasyan Federal Medical Biophysical Center of Federal Medical Biological Agency of Russia

3. Technion – Israel Institute of Technology

4. Sergeev Institute of Environmental Geoscience Russian Academy of Sciences

5. Lomonosov Moscow State University

6. Institute of Industrial Ecology, Ural Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences

7. Research and Technical Center of Radiation-Chemical Safety and Hygiene of Federal Medical Biological Agency of Russia,

8. Federal Center of Hygiene and Epidemiology, Federal Service for Surveillance on Consumer rights Protection and Human Well-Being

Abstract

Significant temporal variations in radon are observed in any buildings, including unoccupied buildings with limited ventilation. This fact causes serious difficulties in radiation monitoring to assess the compliance of premises with the requirements of the normative, which limits the annual average level of radon in buildings. Therefore, neither at the national nor at the international level has yet been solved the problem of standardizing the indoor radon measurement if the test duration is less than a year. An analysis of approaches to radon measurement, including an assessment of the effectiveness of regulation, shows very significant differences between practices established in different countries. For example, in Russia, rapid (no more than 20 min) measurements are mainly used and mitigation measures to protect existing buildings from radon are practically not carried out. In European countries, mainly long-term (at least two months) measurements are used, while mitigation measures are still relatively rare, with the exception of the UK and Sweden. In the USA, short-term (2–7 days) measurements are widely used, which are not only carried out, but also paid for by residents themselves, including mitigation measures. However, despite the established approaches to indoor radon monitoring in Russia and the USA, there is a persistent distrust among specialists in the results of shortterm and, especially, rapid measurements. In this regard, a compromise approach is proposed to standardize radon measurements based on a rational criterion by applying fundamental ISO/IEC concepts such as “measurement uncertainty” and “conformity assessment”. The rational criterion for conformity assessment allows using measurements of different durations, providing a given reliability when making a decision. It also proposes a rationale for optimizing indoor radon monitoring through the participation of not only professional inspectors, but also the population itself due to the possibility of introducing simple methods and inexpensive radon devices within the rational criterion.

Publisher

SPRI of Radiation Hygiene Prof. PV Ramzaev

Subject

Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and imaging

Reference60 articles.

1. UNSCEAR, 2008. Sources and Effects of Ionizing Radiation. UNSCEAR Report to the General Assembly United Nations. Vol. 1. Annex B, New York: United Nations Scientific Committee on the Effects of Atomic Radiation.

2. Barkovsky AN, Akhmatdinov Ruslan R, Akhmatdinov Rustam R, Baryshkov NK, Biblin AM, Bratilova AA, et al. Radiation situation on the territory of the Russian Federation in 2021. Handbook. St. Petersburg; 2022. 72 p. Available from: http://niirg.ru/PDF/inf_sbor/2021.pdf (Accessed 29 May 2023). (In Russian).

3. Cincinelli A, Martellini T. Indoor air quality and health. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2017;14(11): 1286.

4. WHO. Housing and Health Guidelines. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2018.

5. ANSI/AARST MAH. Protocol for Conducting Measurements of Radon and Radon Decay Products in Homes. 2019. Available from: https://standards.aarst.org (Accessed 29 May 2023).

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3