Comparative Analysis of Students’ Satisfaction Regarding Online Vs Traditional Examination at Postgraduate Level in University of Agriculture Faisalabad

Author:

Ali Insha L.,Iftikhar Muhammad

Abstract

An online exam (also called an electronic-Exam) is a good method of conducting papers and other types of important exams with help of the internet. An online exam needs a device capable of accessing the internet such as a computer or a smartphone. This can be either done at an examination centre or at home. This study aimed at making a comparative analysis of post graduate students’ satisfaction regarding online vs. traditional examinations at the University of Agriculture Faisalabad. The sample size for the study was 119. A questionnaire was designed and used for data collection. The collected data were analyzed by using Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS). Results showed that students were more satisfied with traditional exam setup as compared to online exams. Online exams affected students’ performances positively to a great extent. When respondents were asked about the effects of online exams on students’ performance, they perceived it as more positive as compared to the traditional examination system. This study concluded that students were satisfied with the traditional exam setup because of more learning. Satisfaction from online exams was lower. As online exams are also needed of the hour so some developments should be there to make this setup familiar and easy to understand for all students.

Publisher

Roots Press

Reference13 articles.

1. Concannon, F., A. Flynn, and M. Campbell. 2005. What Campus-Based Students Think

2. About the Quality and Benefits of E-Learning. Brit. J. Edu. Tech. 36: 501–512.

3. Hagie, C. and M. Hughes.2005. The positive and challenging aspects of learning online and in traditional face-to-face classrooms: A Student perspective. J. Spe. Edu. Tech. 20:52-9.

4. Kamsin, A. and E. Is. 2005. Is e-learning the solution and substitute for conventional learning? Int. J. Comp. Int. and Manag.13: 79-89.

5. Lance, P. and A. Hattori. 2016. Web: MEASURE Evaluation. 6–8: 62–64.

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3