Author:
Ogunsola Olabanjo Okunlola,Ajayi Oluseye Ayodele,Ojo Temitope Olumuyiwa,Osayi Emmanuel,Wudiri Kucheli,Amoo Babatunde,Ayoka-Ikechukwu Rita,Olumeyan Olufemi Ojuola,Ifechelobi Chukwuemeka,Okonkwo Prosper,Akinro Yewande
Abstract
Abstract
Background
We evaluated cervical cancer program for women living with HIV (WLHIV) to determine program screening rate, primary case finder screening accuracy and treatment and post-treatment screening rate among screen-positive patients.
Methods
A ten-month review of cervical cancer program data among WLHIV aged 15–49 years on HIV care across forty-one comprehensive ART sites, supported by APIN (a PEPFAR implementing partner) for cervical cancer screening and treatment in Nigeria, was conducted from October 2020 to July 2021. Initial screening was done using visual inspection with acetic acid (VIA) followed by a gynaecologist expert review through a program-designed software named AVIVA, as a confirmatory test. Associations were measured between the primary case finder screening accuracy and study covariates at p-value of 0.05.
Results
About 10,289 asymptomatic women aged 15–49 years living with HIV were screened for cervical cancer by primary case finders using VIA-based screening test. About 732 (7.1%) had a positive screening test suggestive of precancerous lesions or cervical cancer. Three hundred and fifteen (43.0%) of VIA positive women had treatment using thermal ablation and less than one-third (21.6%) of those treated came back for post-treatment screening test. Primary case finder screening sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive and negative predictive accuracy using gynaecologist review as confirmatory test were 60.8%, 71.5%, 41.7% and 84.5% respectively. Overall screening accuracy was 68.8%.
Conclusion and recommendations
This innovative approach to cervical cancer screening among WLHIV yielded modest results in preventing program error and wastages. Wider deployment of expert-based reviews of VIA though AVIVA software might be a veritable approach to improve screening accuracy in low resource settings.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Obstetrics and Gynecology,Reproductive Medicine
Reference34 articles.
1. World Health Organization. Cervical cancer. https://www.who.int/health-topics/cervical-cancer#tab=tab_1. Accessed 14 Sep 2021.
2. World Health Organization. WHO releases new estimates of the global burden of cervical cancer associated with HIV. 2020. https://www.who.int/news/item/16-11-2020-who-releases-new-estimates-of-the-global-burden-of-cervical-cancer-associated-with-hiv. Accessed 14 Sep 2021.
3. de Sanjose S, Quint WGV, Alemany L, Geraets DT, Klaustermeier JE, Lloveras B, et al. Human papillomavirus genotype attribution in invasive cervical cancer: a retrospective cross-sectional worldwide study. Lancet Oncol. 2010. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1470-2045(10)70230-8.
4. Adebamowo CA, Adekunle OO. Case-controlled study of the epidemiological risk factors for breast cancer in Nigeria. Br J Surg. 1999. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2168.1999.01117.x.
5. Castellsagué X, de Sanjosé S, Aguado T, Louie K, Bruni L, Muñoz J, et al. HPV and cervical cancer in the World: 2007 Report. Vaccine. 2007;25(Suppl 3):C1–230.