Author:
Uaamnuichai Sutira,Phutrakool Phanupong,Thammasitchai Nareerat,Sathitloetsakun Sarochinee,Santibenchakul Somsook,Jaisamrarn Unnop
Abstract
Abstract
Background
Postpartum sterilization in Thailand has relatively few barriers compared to other countries. The procedure is covered by some healthcare plans, and paid out-of-pocket for others. We aim to determine if healthcare coverage and other socioeconomic factors affect the rate of postpartum sterilization in an urban, tertiary hospital.
Methods
We conducted a secondary analysis of data from a retrospective cohort of 4482 postpartum women who delivered at our hospital. Multivariable logistic regression was conducted to determine if sterilization reimbursement affects immediate postpartum sterilization rate.
Results
Overall immediate postpartum sterilization rate was 17.8%. Route of delivery and parity were similar in those who were reimbursed and those who were not. Women aged over 25 were more likely to have a healthcare plan that does not cover postpartum sterilization. Women whose healthcare plan reimbursed the procedure trended towards postpartum sterilization when compared to women who were not (aOR 1.05, 95% CI 0.86–1.28, p-value = 0.632). Women who delivered via cesarean section were more likely to undergo sterilization at the time of delivery (aOR = 5.87; 95% CI 4.77–7.24, p-value = < 0.001). Women aged 40–44 years were 2.70 times as likely to choose sterilization than those aged 20–24 years (aOR = 2.70; 95% CI 1.61–4.53, p-value < 0.001).
Conclusions
Healthcare coverage of the procedure was not associated with increased postpartum sterilization in our setting.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Obstetrics and Gynecology,Reproductive Medicine
Reference25 articles.
1. Peterson HB, Xia Z, Hughes JM, Wilcox LS, Tylor LR, Trussell J. The risk of pregnancy after tubal sterilization: findings from the U.S. collaborative review of sterilization. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1996;174(4):1161–70. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0002-9378(96)70658-0.
2. Department of Economic and Social Affairs. Contraceptive use by method 2019: data booklet. https://www.un.org/development/desa/pd/sites/www.un.org.development.desa.pd/files/files/documents/2020/Jan/un_2019_contraceptiveusebymethod_databooklet.pdf. Accessed 1 Nov 2022.
3. Singh P, Singh KK, Singh P. Factors explaining the dominion status of female sterilization in India over the past two decades (1992–2016): a multilevel study. PLoS ONE. 2021;16(3):e0246530. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0246530.
4. Foley O, Janiak E, Dutton C. Women’s decision making for postpartum sterilization: does the Medicaid waiting period add value? Contraception. 2018;98(4):312–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.contraception.2018.07.004.
5. Borrero S, Abebe K, Dehlendorf C, et al. Racial variation in tubal sterilization rates: role of patient-level factors. Fertil Steril. 2011;95(1):17–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2010.05.031.
Cited by
4 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献