Author:
Andersson Christian,Kawuki Tonny,Månsson Jonas,Nankaja Christine,Sund Krister,Wigren Emma,Zungu Mathias Mulumba
Abstract
AbstractThis study assesses the impact of a voucher project that targeted vulnerable and poor pregnant women in Uganda. Highly subsidised vouchers gave access to a package of safe delivery services consisting of four antenatal visits, safe delivery, one postnatal visit, the treatment and management of selected pregnancy-related medical conditions and complications, and emergency transport. Vouchers were sold during the project’s operational period from 2016 to 2019. This study covers 8 out of 25 project-benefiting districts in Uganda and a total of 1,881 pregnancies, including both beneficiary and non-beneficiary mothers. Using a matching design, the results show a positive effect on the survival of new-born babies. The difference in the survival rate between the control group and the treatment group is 5.4% points, indicating that the voucher project reduced infant mortality by more than 65 per cent.
Funder
Blekinge Institute of Technology
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference31 articles.
1. Aguilar A, Lakner C, Prydz E, Lopez J, Wu R, Zhao Q. Estimating global poverty in Stata the povcalnet command’, global poverty monitoring technical note. World Bank Group; 2019.
2. Alfonso N, Bishai D, Bua J, Mutebi A, Mayora C, Ekirapa-Kiracho E. Cost-effectiveness analysis of a Voucher Scheme Combined with Obstetrical Quality improvements: quasi experimental results from Uganda. Health Policy Plann. 2015;30(1):88–99.
3. Atuyambe L, Mirembe F, Johansson A, Kirumira EK, Faxelid E. Experiences of pregnant adolescents–voices from Wakiso district, Uganda. Afr Health Sci. 2005;5(4):304–9.
4. Bhatia M, Gorter A. Improving Access to Reproductive and Child Health Services in developing countries: are competitive Voucher schemes an option? J Int Dev. 2007;19(7):975–81.
5. Card D, Krueger A. Minimum wages and employment: a case study of the fast-food industry in New Jersey and Pennsylvania. Am Econ Rev. 1994;84(4):772–93.