Women's voices and meanings of empowerment for reproductive decisions: a qualitative study in Mozambique
-
Published:2024-02-02
Issue:1
Volume:21
Page:
-
ISSN:1742-4755
-
Container-title:Reproductive Health
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Reprod Health
Author:
Castro Lopes Sofia,Constant Deborah,Fraga Sílvia,Harries Jane
Abstract
Abstract
Background
Women in Mozambique are often disempowered when it comes to making decisions concerning their lives, including their bodies and reproductive options. This study aimed to explore the views of women in Mozambique about key elements of empowerment for reproductive decisions and the meanings they attach to these elements.
Methods
Qualitative in-depth interviews were undertaken with 64 women of reproductive age (18–49 years) in two provinces in Mozambique. Participants were recruited through convenience sampling. Data collection took place between February and March 2020 in Maputo city and Province, and during August 2020 in Nampula Province. A thematic analysis was performed.
Results
Women described crucial elements of how power is exerted for reproductive choices. These choices include the ability to plan the number and timing of pregnancies and the ability either to negotiate with sexual partners by voicing choice and influencing decisions, or to exercise their right to make decisions independently. They considered that women with empowerment had characteristics such as independence, active participation and being free. These characteristics are recognized key enablers for the process of women’s empowerment.
Conclusions
This study’s findings contribute to an expanded conceptualization and operationalization of women’s sexual and reproductive empowerment by unveiling key elements that need to be considered in future research and approaches to women’s empowerment. Furthermore, it gave women the central role and voice in the research of empowerment's conceptualization and measurement where women’s views and meanings are seldom considered.
Funder
Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia
Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Cape Town
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Obstetrics and Gynecology,Reproductive Medicine
Reference39 articles.
1. United Nations (UN). SDG indicator metadata (SDG 5). Department of Economic and Social Affairs Statistics; 2022. https://unstats.un.org/sdgs/metadata/files/Metadata-05-06-01.pdf.
2. Upadhyay UD, Gipson JD, Withers M, Lewis S, Fraser CS, Huchko MJ, et al. Women’s empowerment and fertility: a review of the literature. Soc Sci Med. 2014;31:1713–23.
3. Prata N, Fraser A, Huchko MJ, Gipson JD, Withers M, Lewis S, et al. Women’s empowerment and family planning: a review of the literature. J Biosoc Sci. 2017;49:713–43.
4. Richardson RA. Measuring women’s empowerment: a critical review of current practices and recommendations for researchers. Soc Indic Res. 2017;137:539–57. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-017-1622-4.
5. Edmeades J, Mejia C, Parsons J, Sebany M. Conceptual framework for reproductive empowerment: empowering individuals and couples to improve their health (Background Paper). 2018. https://www.icrw.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/10/Reproductive-Empowerment-Background-Paper_100318-FINAL.pdf.