Abstract
Abstract
Background
Diabetic patients are at an increased risk of cardiovascular morbidities. We aimed to examine if elevated pre-operative glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c) levels are associated with higher likelihood of experiencing adverse events in on-pump (ONCAB) versus off-pump (OPCAB) coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) procedures. We examined characteristics of patients undergoing CABG using our institutional STS Adult Cardiac Surgery Database (ACSD) from 2014 to 2020. Descriptive statistics and univariate analyses were used to compare postoperative outcomes between ONCAB and OPCAB based on preoperative HbA1c levels: (1) HbA1c ≤ 6.0%, (2) 6.0% < HbA1c ≤ 7.0%, (3) 7.0% < HbA1c ≤ 8.5%, (4) HbA1c > 8.5%. Multivariable models were built to assess risk factors associated with adverse events. Primary outcomes were operative mortality and stroke.
Results
For ONCAB, statistically significant associations were found between increasing HbA1c and new post-operative dialysis (p=0.01), rates of readmission (p=0.003) and greater lengths of stay (p=0.002). For OPCAB, statistically significant associations were found between increasing HbA1c and rates of operative mortality (p=0.04), post-operative renal failure (p=0.0001), new post-operative dialysis (p=0.0001), sternal wound infection (p=0.01), and greater lengths of stay (p=0.03). No significant relationship was noted between HbA1c and stroke, reoperation due to bleeding, or post-operative transfusion.
Conclusions
Increasing HbA1c positively correlated with numerous adverse patient outcomes in both ONCAB and OPCAB, and differences were noted in which outcomes were most impacted between the two techniques. Pre-operative medical optimization from a diabetes standpoint is paramount to improve CABG outcomes in both on-pump or off-pump techniques.
Funder
Diabetes Research Center
Nutrition Obesity Research Center, University of Alabama at Birmingham
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference30 articles.
1. “Stats of the State of Alabama.” Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 13 Apr. 2018, https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/pressroom/states/alabama/alabama.htm
2. McCullough A P (2007) Coronary Artery Disease. CJASN. 2(3):611–616. https://doi.org/10.2215/CJN.03871106
3. Adlea GS, Bakaeen FG, Pal J, Thourani VH, Firestone S, Mitchell JD (2015) The Society of Thoracic Surgeons Clinical Practice Guidelines on Arterial Conduits for Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting. Ann Thorac Surg 101(2):801–809. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.athoracsur.2015.09.100
4. Shaefi S, Mittel A, Loberman D, Ramakrishna H (2019) Off-Pump Versus On-Pump Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting-A Systematic Review and Analysis of Clinical Outcomes. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 33(1):232–244. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.jvca.2018.04.012
5. Hammoud T, Tanguay JF, Bourassa MG (2000) Management of coronary artery disease: therapeutic options in patients with diabetes. J Am Coll Cardiol. 36(2):355–65. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0735-1097(00)00732-4