Author:
Plantinga Laura C,Fink Nancy E,Jaar Bernard G,Sadler John H,Levin Nathan W,Coresh Josef,Klag Michael J,Powe Neil R
Abstract
Abstract
Background
Clinical performance targets are intended to improve patient outcomes in chronic disease through quality improvement, but evidence of an association between multiple target attainment and patient outcomes in routine clinical practice is often lacking.
Methods
In a national prospective cohort study (ESRD Quality, or EQUAL), we examined whether attainment of multiple targets in 668 incident hemodialysis patients from 74 U.S. not-for-profit dialysis clinics was associated with better outcomes. We measured whether the following accepted clinical performance targets were met at 6 months after study enrollment: albumin (≥4.0 g/dl), hemoglobin (≥11 g/dl), calcium-phosphate product (<55 mg2/dl2), dialysis dose (Kt/V≥1.2), and vascular access type (fistula). Outcomes included mortality, hospital admissions, hospital days, and hospital costs.
Results
Attainment of each of the five targets was associated individually with better outcomes; e.g., patients who attained the albumin target had decreased mortality [relative hazard (RH) = 0.55, 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.41–0.75], hospital admissions [incidence rate ratio (IRR) = 0.67, 95% CI, 0.62–0.73], hospital days (IRR = 0.61, 95% CI, 0.58–0.63), and hospital costs (average annual cost reduction = $3,282, P = 0.002), relative to those who did not. Increasing numbers of targets attained were also associated, in a graded fashion, with decreased mortality (P = 0.030), fewer hospital admissions and days (P < 0.001 for both), and lower costs (P = 0.029); these trends remained statistically significant for all outcomes after adjustment (P < 0.001), except cost, which was marginally significant (P = 0.052).
Conclusion
Attainment of more clinical performance targets, regardless of which targets, was strongly associated with decreased mortality, hospital admissions, and resource use in hemodialysis patients.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference45 articles.
1. Crossing the Quality Chasm: A New Health System for the 21st Century. Edited by: Committee on Quality of Health Care in America IM. 2001, Washington, DC, National Academy Press
2. Lowrie EG, Teng M, Lacson E, Lew N, Lazarus JM, Owen WF: Association between prevalent care process measures and facility-specific mortality rates. Kidney Int. 2001, 60: 1917-1929. 10.1046/j.1523-1755.2001.00029.x.
3. Lacson E, Teng M, Lazarus JM, Lew N, Lowrie E, Owen W: Limitations of the facility-specific standardized mortality ratio for profiling health care quality in dialysis. Am J Kidney Dis. 2001, 37: 267-275.
4. Foundation NK: Kidney Disease Outcomes Quality Initiative (K/DOQI). http://www.kidney.org/professionals/doqi. 2005, [http://www.kidney.org/professionals/KDOQI/]
5. Lowrie EG, Huang WH, Lew NL: Death risk predictors among peritoneal dialysis and hemodialysis patients: a preliminary comparison. Am J Kidney Dis. 1995, 26: 220-228.