Author:
Campbell Fiona,Dickinson Heather O,Cook Julia VF,Beyer Fiona R,Eccles Martin,Mason James M
Abstract
Abstract
Background
To be useful, clinical practice guidelines need to be evidence based; otherwise they will not achieve the validity, reliability and credibility required for implementation.
Methods
This paper compares the methods used in gathering, analysing and linking of evidence to guideline recommendations in ten current hypertension guidelines.
Results
It found several guidelines had failed to implement methods of searching for the relevant literature, critical analysis and linking to recommendations that minimise the risk of bias in the interpretation of research evidence. The more rigorous guidelines showed discrepancies in recommendations and grading that reflected different approaches to the use of evidence in guideline development.
Conclusion
Clinical practice guidelines as a methodology are clearly still an evolving health care technology.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference124 articles.
1. Field MJ, Lohr KN, (eds): Institute of Medicine Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines. Guidelines for clinical practice: from development to use. 1992, Washington DC, National Academy Press
2. Dans PE: Credibility, cookbook medicine, and common sense: guidelines and the college. Annals of Internal Medicine. 1994, 120: 966-968.
3. Guidelines CCP: Clinical practice guidelines: directions for a new program. Edited by: Field MG LKN. 1990, Washington, National Academy Press, Institute of Medicine
4. Eccles M, Freemantle N, Mason J: Developing cost effectiveness guidelines. BMJ. 1997, 27-27.
5. Collaboration TAGREE: Development and validation of an interational appraisal instrument for assessing the quality of clinical practice guidelines: the AGREE project. Quality and Safety in Health Care. 2003, 12: 18-23. 10.1136/qhc.12.1.18.
Cited by
18 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献