Researching the mental health needs of hard-to-reach groups: managing multiple sources of evidence

Author:

Dowrick Christopher,Gask Linda,Edwards Suzanne,Aseem Saadia,Bower Peter,Burroughs Heather,Catlin Amy,Chew-Graham Carolyn,Clarke Pam,Gabbay Mark,Gowers Simon,Hibbert Derek,Kovandzic Marija,Lamb Jonathan,Lovell Karina,Rogers Anne,Lloyd-Williams Mari,Waheed Waquas,

Abstract

Abstract Background Common mental health problems impose substantial challenges to patients, carers, and health care systems. A range of interventions have demonstrable efficacy in improving the lives of people experiencing such problems. However many people are disadvantaged, either because they are unable to access primary care, or because access does not lead to adequate help. New methods are needed to understand the problems of access and generate solutions. In this paper we describe our methodological approach to managing multiple and diverse sources of evidence, within a research programme to increase equity of access to high quality mental health services in primary care. Methods We began with a scoping review to identify the range and extent of relevant published material, and establish key concepts related to access. We then devised a strategy to collect - in parallel - evidence from six separate sources: a systematic review of published quantitative data on access-related studies; a meta-synthesis of published qualitative data on patient perspectives; dialogues with local stakeholders; a review of grey literature from statutory and voluntary service providers; secondary analysis of patient transcripts from previous qualitative studies; and primary data from interviews with service users and carers. We synthesised the findings from these diverse sources, made judgements on key emerging issues in relation to needs and services, and proposed a range of potential interventions. These proposals were debated and refined using iterative electronic and focus group consultation procedures involving international experts, local stakeholders and service users. Conclusions Our methods break new ground by generating and synthesising multiple sources of evidence, connecting scientific understanding with the perspectives of users, in order to develop innovative ways to meet the mental health needs of under-served groups.

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

Health Policy

Reference45 articles.

1. WHO International Consortium in Psychiatric Epidemiology: Cross-national comparisons of the prevalences and correlates of mental disorders. Bull WHO. 2000, 78: 413-26.

2. Murray CJL, Lopez AD: The Global Burden of Disease. 1996, Boston, Mass.,: World Health Organization and Harvard University Press

3. Social Exclusion Unit: Mental health and social exclusion. 2004, London, Office of the Deputy Prime Minister

4. Layard R: The case for psychological treatment centres. BMJ. 2006, 332: 1030-2. 10.1136/bmj.332.7548.1030.

5. National Institute for Clinical Excellence: Depression: Management of Depression in Primary and Secondary Care. Clinical Guideline 23. 2004, London, British Psychological Society and Gaskell

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3