Author:
Cockcroft Anne,Andersson Neil,Paredes-Solís Sergio,Caldwell Dawn,Mitchell Steve,Milne Deborah,Merhi Serge,Roche Melissa,Konceviciute Elena,Ledogar Robert J
Abstract
Abstract
Background
Cross-country comparisons of unofficial payments in the health sector are sparse. In 2002 we conducted a social audit of the health sector of the three Baltic States.
Methods
Some 10,320 household interviews from a stratified, last-stage-random, sample of 30 clusters per country, together with institutional reviews, produced preliminary results. Separate focus groups of service users, nurses and doctors interpreted these findings. Stakeholder workshops in each country discussed the survey and focus group results.
Results
Nearly one half of the respondents did not consider unofficial payments to health workers to be corruption, yet one half (Estonia 43%, Latvia 45%, Lithuania 64%) thought the level of corruption in government health services was high. Very few (Estonia 1%, Latvia 3%, Lithuania 8%) admitted to making unofficial payments in their last contact with the services. Around 14% of household members across the three countries gave gifts in their last contact with government services.
Conclusion
This social audit allowed comparison of perceptions, attitudes and experience regarding unofficial payments in the health services of the three Baltic States. Estonia showed least corruption. Latvia was in the middle. Lithuania evidenced the most unofficial payments, the greatest mistrust towards the system. These findings can serve as a baseline for interventions, and to compare each country's approach to health service reform in relation to unofficial payments.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference50 articles.
1. Meiesaar K, Lember M: Efficiency and sustainability of using resources in Estonian primary health care. Croatian Medical Journal. 2004, 45: 573-577.
2. Jesse M, Habicht J, Asviksoo A, Koppel A, Irs A, Thomson S: Health care in systems in transition: Estonia. 2004, WHO Regional Office for Europe on behalf of the European Observatory on Health Systems and Policies. Copenhagen
3. Polluste K, Mannik G, Axelsson R: Public health reforms in Estonia: impact on the health of the population. BMJ. 2005, 331: 210-213. 10.1136/bmj.331.7510.210.
4. Lember M: A policy of introducing a new contract and funding system of general practice in Estonia. International Journal of Health Planning and Management. 2002, 17: 41-53. 10.1002/hpm.651.
5. Estonian Health Insurance Fund. Accessed 16 April 2007, [http://www.haigkassa.ee/eng/ehif/]
Cited by
49 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献