Abstract
Abstract
Background
Access to water and sanitation is a basic human right; however, in many parts of the world, communities experience water, sanitation, and hygiene (WaSH) insecurity. While WaSH insecurity is prevalent in many low and middle-income countries, it is also a problem in high-income countries, like the United States, as is evident in vulnerable populations, including people experiencing homelessness. Limited knowledge exists about the coping strategies unhoused people use to access WaSH services. This study, therefore, examines WaSH access among unhoused communities in Los Angeles, California, a city with the second-highest count of unhoused people across the nation.
Methods
We conducted a cross-sectional study using a snowball sampling technique with 263 unhoused people living in Skid Row, Los Angeles. We calculated frequencies and used multivariable models to describe (1) how unhoused communities cope and gain access to WaSH services in different places, and (2) what individual-level factors contribute to unhoused people’s ability to access WaSH services.
Results
Our findings reveal that access to WaSH services for unhoused communities in Los Angeles is most difficult at night. Reduced access to overnight sanitation resulted in 19% of the sample population using buckets inside their tents and 28% openly defecating in public spaces. Bottled water and public taps are the primary drinking water source, but 6% of the sample reported obtaining water from fire hydrants, and 50% of the population stores water for night use. Unhoused people also had limited access to water and soap for hand hygiene throughout the day, with 17% of the sample relying on hand sanitizer to clean their hands. Shower and laundry access were among the most limited services available, and reduced people’s ability to maintain body hygiene practices and limited employment opportunities. Our regression models suggest that WaSH access is not homogenous among the unhoused. Community differences exist; the odds of having difficulty accessing sanitation services is two times greater for those living outside of Skid Row (Adj OR: 2.52; 95% CI: 1.08–6.37) and three times greater for people who have been unhoused for more than six years compared to people who have been unhoused for less than a year (Adj OR: 3.26; 95% CI: 1.36–8.07).
Conclusion
Overall, this study suggests a need for more permanent, 24-h access to WaSH services for unhoused communities living in Skid Row, including toilets, drinking water, water and soap for hand hygiene, showers, and laundry services.
Funder
Fogarty International Center of the National Institutes of Health and and the University of California Global Health Institute
National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences
University of Southern California
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health,Health Policy
Reference83 articles.
1. UN Committee on Economic Social and Cultural Rights (CESCR). General Comment No. 15: The Right to Water (Arts. 11 and 12 of the Covenant). 2003. Available from: https://www.refworld.org/docid/4538838d11.html.
2. United Nations (UN) General Assembly. The human right to water and sanitation: Resolution adpted by the General Assembly A/RES/64/292. 2010. Available from: https://www.refworld.org/docid/4cc926b02.html.
3. World Health Organization (WHO) and the United Nations Children’s Fund (UNICEF). Progress on household drinking water, sanitation, and hygiene 2000–2020: Five years into the SDGs. Geneva; 2021. Available from: https://washdata.org/sites/default/files/2022-01/jmp-2021-wash-households_3.pdf.
4. Wutich A. Water insecurity: An agenda for research and call to action for human biology. Am J Hum Biol. 2020;32:1–16.
5. Meehan K, Jepson W, Harris LM, Wutich A, Beresford M, Fencl A, et al. Exposing the myths of household water insecurity in the global north: A critical review. Wiley Interdiscip Rev Water. 2020;7:1–20.
Cited by
14 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献