Are institutional deliveries equitable in the southern states of India? A benefit incidence analysis

Author:

Sharma Santosh Kumar,Nambiar Devaki

Abstract

Abstract Background Despite a commendable rise in the number of women seeking delivery care at public health institutions in South India, it is unclear if the benefit accrues to wealthier or poorer socio-economic groups. The study’s aim was to investigate at how the public subsidy is distributed among Indian women who give birth in public hospitals in the southern regions. Methods Data from the Indian Demographic Health Survey’s fifth wave (NFHS-5, 2019–21) was used in this study. A total of 22, 403 were institutional deliveries across all the southern states of India were included. Out-of-pocket expenditure (OOPE) on childbirth in health institutions was the outcome variable. We used summary statistics, Benefits Incidence Analysis (BIA), concentration index (CI), and concentration curve (CC) were used. Results Most women in the lowest, poorest, and medium quintiles of wealth opted to give birth in public facilities. In contrast, about 69% of mothers belonging to highest quintile gave birth in private health institutions. The magnitude of CI and CC of institutional delivery indicates that public sector usage was concentrated among poorer quintiles [CIX: − 0.178; SE: 0.005; p < 0.001] and private sector usage was concentrated among wealthier quintiles [CIX: 0.239; SE: 0.006; p < 0.001]. Benefit incidence analyses suggest that middle quintile of women received the maximum public subsidy in primary health centres (33.23%), followed by richer quintile (25.62%), and poorer wealth quintiles (24.84%). These pattern in the secondary health centres was similar. Conclusion Poorer groups utilize the public sector for institutional delivery in greater proportions than the private sector. Middle quintiles seem to benefit the most from public subsidy in terms of the median cost of service and non-payment. Greater efforts must be made to understand how and why these groups are being left behind and what policy measures can enhance their inclusion and financial risk protection.

Funder

The Wellcome Trust DBT India Alliance

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health,Health Policy

Reference51 articles.

1. National Health Accounts. National Health Accounts| National Health Systems Resource Centre [Internet]. Natl. Health Syst. Resour. Cent. 2022 [cited 2023 Feb 13]. Available from: https://nhsrcindia.org/national-health-accounts-records.

2. The Economic Times. Govt health expenditure share in GDP increases to 1.35% from 1.15%. Econ Times [Internet]. 2021 Nov 29 [cited 2023 Feb 12]; Available from: https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/industry/healthcare/biotech/healthcare/govt-health-expenditure-share-in-gdp-increases-to-1-35-from-1-15/articleshow/87979753.cms?from=mdr.

3. Thomas AR, Dash U, Sahu SK. Illnesses and hardship financing in India: an evaluation of inpatient and outpatient cases, 2014-18. BMC Public Health. 2023;23:204.

4. World Bank. Current health expenditure (% of GDP)| Data [Internet]. 2019 [cited 2023 Apr 7]. Available from: https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/SH.XPD.CHEX.GD.ZS?name_desc=false.

5. Mohanty SK, Mishra RS, Mishra S, Sen S. Understanding equity of institutional delivery in public health centre by level of care in India: an assessment using benefit incidence analysis. Int J Equity Health. 2020;19:217.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3