Equity considerations for the implementation of health insurance benefit package in Ethiopia: result of expert Delphi exercise

Author:

Memirie Solomon Tessema,Argaw Muluken,Tolla Mieraf Taddesse,Abebe Frehiwot,Dagnaw Wubaye Walelgne,Norheim Ole F.,Yigezu Amanuel

Abstract

Abstract Background Efficiency, equity and financial risk protection are key health systems objectives. Equitable distribution of health care is among the priority strategic initiative of the government of Ethiopia. However, data on the distribution of interventions benefits or on disease burden disaggregated by subpopulations to guide health care priority setting is not available in Ethiopia. Methods Aligned with policy documents, we identified the following groups to be the worse off in the Ethiopian context: under-five children, women of reproductive age, the poor, and rural residents. We used the Delphi technique by a panel of 28 experts to assign a score for 253 diseases/conditions over a period of two days, in phases. The expert panel represented different institutes and professional mix. Experts assigned a score 1 to 4; where 4 indicates disease/condition predominantly affecting the poor and rural residents and 1 indicates a condition more prevalent among the wealthy and urban residents. Subsequently, the average equity score was computed for each disease/condition. Results The average scores ranged from 1.11 (for vitiligo) to 3.79 (for obstetric fistula). We standardized the scores to be bounded between 1 and 2; 1 the lowest equity score and 2 the highest equity score. The scores for each disease/condition were then assigned to their corresponding interventions. We used these equity scores to adjust the CEA values for each of the interventions. To adjust the CEA values for equity, we multiplied the health benefits (the denominator of the cost-effectiveness value) of each intervention by the corresponding equity scores, resulting in equity adjusted CEA values. The equity adjusted CEA was then used to rank the interventions using a league table. Conclusions The Delphi method can be useful in generating equity scores for prioritizing health interventions where disaggregated data on the distribution of diseases or access to interventions by subpopulation groups are not available.

Funder

Ethiopian Health Insurance Service

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Reference28 articles.

1. Summers LH, et al. Economists’ declaration on universal health coverage. Lancet. 2015;386(10008):2112–1223.

2. The World Bank. Current health expenditure per capita (current US$). https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/SH.XPD.CHEX.PC.CD. Accessed 17 August 2023.

3. World Health Organization. Making fair choices on the path to universal health coverage: final report of the WHO Consultative Group on Equity and Universal Health coverage. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2014.

4. Baltussen R, Mwalim O, Blanchet K, et al. Decision-making processes for essential packages of healthm services: experience from six countries. BMJ Global Health. 2023;8:e010704. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2022-010704.

5. Eregata GT, Hailu A, Geletu ZA, et al. Revision of the Ethiopian essential health service package: an explication of the process and methods used. Health Syst Reform. 2020;6:e1829313.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3