Author:
St. John Brittany M.,Hickey Emily,Kastern Edward,Russell Chad,Russell Tina,Mathy Ashley,Peterson Brogan,Wigington Don,Pellien Casey,Caudill Allison,Hladik Libby,Ausderau Karla K.
Abstract
Abstract
Background
Advances in health equity rely on representation of diverse groups in population health research samples. Despite progress in the diversification of research samples, continued expansion to include systematically excluded groups is needed to address health inequities. One such group that is infrequently represented in population health research are adults with intellectual disability. Individuals with intellectual disability experience pervasive health disparities. Representation in population health research is crucial to determine the root causes of inequity, understand the health of diverse populations, and address health disparities. The purpose of this paper was to develop recommendations for researchers to increase the accessibility of university health research and to support the inclusion of adults with intellectual disability as participants in health research.
Methods
A comprehensive literature review, consultation with the university ethics review board, and review of United States federal regulations was completed to identify barriers to research participation for individuals with intellectual disability. A collaborative stakeholder working group developed recommendations and products to increase the accessibility of university research for participants with intellectual disability.
Results
Eleven key barriers to research participation were identified including gaps in researchers’ knowledge, lack of trust, accessibility and communication challenges, and systematic exclusion among others. Together the stakeholder working group compiled seven general recommendations for university health researchers to guide inclusion efforts. Recommendations included: 1) address the knowledge gap, 2) build community partnerships, 3) use plain language, 4) simplify consent and assent processes, 5) establish research capacity to consent, 6) offer universal supports and accommodations, and 7) practice accessible dissemination. In addition, four products were created as part of the stakeholder working group to be shared with researchers to support the inclusion of participants with intellectual disability. 1) Supports I Need Checklist, 2) Plain language glossary of health and research terms, 3) Understanding Consent and Assent in Plain Language, 4) Easy-Read Paper Template.
Conclusion
Community members and individuals with intellectual disability want to be included in research and are eager to engage as research participants. It is the responsibility of the researcher to open the door to university health research. The recommendations discussed in this paper could increase accessibility for a broader range of research participants and, in particular, promote the inclusion of individuals with intellectual disability to advance health equity in population health research.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health,Health Policy
Reference64 articles.
1. Studies I of M (US) C on E and LIR to the I of W in C, Mastroianni AC, Faden R, Federman D. NIH Revitalization Act of 1993 Public Law 103-43 [Internet]. Women and Health Research: Ethical and Legal Issues of Including Women in Clinical Studies: Volume I. National Academies Press (US)
2. 1994 [cited 2021 Nov 22]. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK236531/.
3. Bernard MA, Clayton JA, Lauer MS. Inclusion across the lifespan: NIH policy for clinical research. JAMA. 2018;320(15):1535–6.
4. Oh SS, Galanter J, Thakur N, Pino-Yanes M, Barcelo NE, White MJ, et al. Diversity in clinical and biomedical research: A promise yet to be fulfilled. PLoS Med. 2015;12(12):e1001918.
5. Spong CY, Bianchi DW. Improving public health requires inclusion of underrepresented populations in research. JAMA. 2018;319(4):337–8.
Cited by
8 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献