Author:
Manibharathi Sekar,Somasundaram Selvaraj,Parasuraman Panneerselvam,Subramanian Alagesan,Ravichandran Veerasamy,Manikanda Boopathi Narayanan
Abstract
AbstractLessons learned from past experiences push for an alternate way of crop production. In India, adopting high density planting system (HDPS) to boost cotton yield is becoming a growing trend. HDPS has recently been considered a replacement for the current Indian production system. It is also suitable for mechanical harvesting, which reducing labour costs, increasing input use efficiency, timely harvesting timely, maintaining cotton quality, and offering the potential to increase productivity and profitability. This technology has become widespread in globally cotton growing regions. Water management is critical for the success of high density cotton planting. Due to the problem of freshwater availability, more crops should be produced per drop of water. In the high-density planting system, optimum water application is essential to control excessive vegetative growth and improve the translocation of photoassimilates to reproductive organs. Deficit irrigation is a tool to save water without compromising yield. At the same time, it consumes less water than the normal evapotranspiration of crops. This review comprehensively documents the importance of growing cotton under a high-density planting system with deficit irrigation. Based on the current research and combined with cotton production reality, this review discusses the application and future development of deficit irrigation, which may provide theoretical guidance for the sustainable advancement of cotton planting systems.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference121 articles.
1. Abdelkhalik A, Pascual B, Nájera I, et al. Deficit irrigation as a sustainable practice in improving irrigation water use efficiency in cauliflower under Mediterranean conditions. Agron. 2019;9(11):732. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy9110732.
2. Adare ZM, Srinivas A, Rao VP, et al. Association of weather variables with yield and yield components of cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) at reproductive phenophase. Afr J Agric Res. 2016;11(29):2555–61. https://doi.org/10.5897/AJAR2016.11090.
3. Ahlawat IP, Gangaiah B. Response of Bt cotton (Gossypium hirsutum) hybrids to irrigation. Indian J Agric Sci. 2010;80(4):271–4.
4. Ale S, Omani N, Himanshu SK, et al. Determining optimum irrigation termination periods for cotton production in the Texas High Plains. Trans ASABE. 2020;63(1):105–15. https://doi.org/10.13031/trans.13483.
5. Ali M, Ali L, Sattar M, et al. Response of seed cotton yield to various plant populations and planting methods. J Agric Res. 2010;48(2):164–9.