Author:
Chua Bernard Ji Guang,Low Chen Ee,Yau Chun En,Tan Ya Hwee,Chiang Jianbang,Chang Esther Wei Yin,Chan Jason Yongsheng,Poon Eileen Yi Ling,Somasundaram Nagavalli,Rashid Mohamed Farid Bin Harunal,Tao Miriam,Lim Soon Thye,Yang Valerie Shiwen
Abstract
AbstractThe use of central nervous system (CNS) prophylaxis for patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) remains controversial. Although uncommon, CNS relapses are invariably fatal in this otherwise curable disease. Accurate identification of patients at risk and the optimal approach to CNS prophylaxis therefore remains an area of unmet need. The existing literature, largely retrospective in nature, provides mixed conclusions regarding the efficacy of CNS prophylaxis. The utility of CNS prophylaxis has itself been challenged. In this review, we dissect the issues which render the value of CNS prophylaxis uncertain. We first compare international clinical guidelines for CNS prophylaxis. We then interrogate the factors that should be used to identify high-risk patients accurately. We also explore how clinical patterns of CNS relapse have changed in the pre-rituximab and rituximab era. We then discuss the efficacy of CNS-directed approaches, intensification of systemic treatment and other novel approaches in CNS prophylaxis. Improved diagnostics for early detection of CNS relapses and newer therapeutics for CNS prophylaxis are areas of active investigation. In an area where prospective, randomized studies are impracticable and lacking, guidance for the use of CNS prophylaxis will depend on rigorous statistical review of retrospective data.
Funder
National Medical Research Council Transition Award
SingHealth Duke-NUS Oncology Academic Clinical Programme
Khoo Pilot Collaborative Award
National Medical Research Council Clinician Scientist-Individual Research Grant-New Investigator Grant
Terry Fox Grant
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC