From uncertain to certain—how to proceed with variants of uncertain significance
-
Published:2024-08-16
Issue:1
Volume:29
Page:
-
ISSN:2090-3251
-
Container-title:Middle East Fertility Society Journal
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Middle East Fertil Soc J
Author:
Banerjee Emili, Pal Suman, Biswas Abhijit, Bhattacharjee KoutilyaORCID
Abstract
AbstractWith the increased next generation sequencing (NGS) based genetic diagnosis due to technological boon, the biomedical world is getting a substantial number of single nucleotide variations (SNVs) every day along with other genetic variations. The detected SNVs may or may not have clinical significance. Based on different levels of study, these SNVs are categorized either as disease associated or not disease associated. However, there exists another category called as “uncertain” where the scientific literature has scanty of data. These “uncertain” or “variants of uncertain significance (VUS)” has become the greatest challenge for the diagnostic fraternity since no specific decision can be taken by them for the persons carrying the VUS. Therefore, there exists a huge knowledge gap that needs to be addressed for better patient care. The present study aims to find out the possible ways of investigation that may help in reducing this knowledge gap so that decisive approaches can be made against VUS for better and accurate patient care.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference43 articles.
1. Richards S, Aziz N, Bale S, Bick D, Das S, Gastier-Foster J, Grody WW, Hegde M, Lyon E, Spector E, Voelkerding K, Rehm HL; ACMG Laboratory Quality Assurance Committee. Standards and guidelines for the interpretation of sequence variants: a joint consensus recommendation of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics and the Association for Molecular Pathology. Genet Med. 2015 May;17(5):405–24. https://doi.org/10.1038/gim.2015.30. Epub 2015 Mar 5. 2. Trent RJ (2012) Molecular medicine. Academic Press, Sydney, Ronald J Trent 3. Li B, Wang Z, Chen Q, Li K, Wang X, Wang Y, Zeng Q, Han Y, Lu B, Zhao Y, Zhang R, Jiang L, Pan H, Luo T, Zhang Y, Fang Z, Xiao X, Zhou X, Wang R, Zhou L, Wang Y, Yuan Z, Xia L, Guo J, Tang B, Xia K, Zhao G, Li J (2021) GPCards: an integrated database of genotype-phenotype correlations in human genetic diseases. Comput Struct Biotechnol J 22(19):1603–1611. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csbj.2021.03.011 4. Sherry ST, Ward MH, Kholodov M, Baker J, Phan L, Smigielski EM, Sirotkin K (2001) dbSNP: the NCBI database of genetic variation. Nucleic Acids Res 29(1):308–311. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/29.1.308 5. Cunningham F, Allen JE, Allen J, Alvarez-Jarreta J, Amode MR, Armean IM, Austine-Orimoloye O, Azov AG, Barnes I, Bennett R, Berry A, Bhai J, Bignell A, Billis K, Boddu S, Brooks L, Charkhchi M, Cummins C, Da Rin Fioretto L, Davidson C, Dodiya K, Donaldson S, El Houdaigui B, El Naboulsi T, Fatima R, Giron CG, Genez T, Martinez JG, Guijarro-Clarke C, Gymer A, Hardy M, Hollis Z, Hourlier T, Hunt T, Juettemann T, Kaikala V, Kay M, Lavidas I, Le T, Lemos D, Marugán JC, Mohanan S, Mushtaq A, Naven M, Ogeh DN, Parker A, Parton A, Perry M, Piližota I, Prosovetskaia I, Sakthivel MP, Salam AIA, Schmitt BM, Schuilenburg H, Sheppard D, Pérez-Silva JG, Stark W, Steed E, Sutinen K, Sukumaran R, Sumathipala D, Suner MM, Szpak M, Thormann A, Tricomi FF, Urbina-Gómez D, Veidenberg A, Walsh TA, Walts B, Willhoft N, Winterbottom A, Wass E, Chakiachvili M, Flint B, Frankish A, Giorgetti S, Haggerty L, Hunt SE, IIsley GR, Loveland JE, Martin FJ, Moore B, Mudge JM, Muffato M, Perry E, Ruffier M, Tate J, Thybert D, Trevanion SJ, Dyer S, Harrison PW, Howe KL, Yates AD, Zerbino DR, Flicek P. Ensembl 2022. Nucleic Acids Res. 2022;50(D1):D988-D995. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkab1049.
|
|