Author:
Vizi Zsolt,Batki Bálint,Rátki Luca,Szalánczi Szabolcs,Fehérváry István,Kozák Péter,Kiss Tímea
Abstract
Abstract
Background
Precisely predicting the water levels of rivers is critical for planning and supporting flood hazard and risk assessments and maintaining navigation, irrigation, and water withdrawal for urban areas and industry. In Hungary, the water level of rivers has been recorded since the early nineteenth century, and various water level prediction methods were developed. The Discrete Linear Cascade Model (DLCM) has been used since 1980s. However, its performance is not always reliable under the current climate-driven hydrological changes. Therefore, we aimed to test machine learning algorithms to make 7-day ahead forecasts, choose the best-performing model, and compare it with the actual DLCM.
Results
According to the results, the Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) model provided the best results in all time horizons, giving more precise predictions than the Baseline model, the Linear or Multilayer Perceptron Model. Despite underestimating water levels, the validation of the LSTM model revealed that 68.5‒76.1% of predictions fall within the required precision intervals. Predictions were relatively accurate for low (≤ 239 cm) and flood stages (≥ 650 cm), but became less reliable for medium stages (240–649 cm).
Conclusions
The LSTM model provided better results in all hydrological situations than the DLCM. Though, LSTM is not a novel concept, its encoder–decoder architecture is the best option for solving multi-horizon forecasting problems (or “Many-to-Many” problems), and it can be trained effectively on vast volumes of data. Thus, we recommend testing the LSTM model in similar hydrological conditions (e.g., lowland, medium-sized river with low slope and mobile channel) to get reliable water level forecasts under the rapidly changing climate and various human impacts.
Graphical Abstract
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference42 articles.
1. Adikari KE, Shrestha S, Ratnayake DT, Budhathoki A, Mohanasundaram S, Dailey MN (2021) Evaluation of artificial intelligence models for flood and drought forecasting in arid and tropical regions. Environ Model Softw 144:105136
2. Ahmed AAM, Deo RC, Ghahramani A, Feng Q, Raj N, Yin Z, Yang L (2022) New double decomposition deep learning methods for river water level forecasting. Sci Total Environ 831:154722
3. Bartha P, Bálint G, Gauzer B (1998) Expected evolution of the Tisza flood wave. VITUKI Hungary Ltd, Budapest, p 22
4. Bartha P, Szöllősi-Nagy A, Harkányi K (1983) Hydrological data collection and forecasting system. Danube Vízügyi Közlemények 45(3):373–388
5. Bálint G, Bartha P (1982) Large-scale assessment of snow resources for forecasting spring flow. Hydrological Aspects of Alpine and High-Mountain Areas. Int Assoc Hydrol Sci 138:203–208
Cited by
4 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献