Agricultural GMOs and their associated pesticides: misinformation, science, and evidence

Author:

Antoniou Michael N.ORCID,Robinson Claire,Castro Irina,Hilbeck Angelika

Abstract

AbstractMisinformation has always existed, but it became a major preoccupation during the COVID-19 pandemic due to its ability to affect public health choices, decisions, and policy. In their article, “Misinformation in the media: Global coverage of GMOs 2019–2021” (GM Crops & Food, 17 Nov 2022), Mark Lynas et al. characterise critics of agricultural genetically modified organisms (GMOs) and their associated pesticides as purveyors of “misinformation”. They draw an equivalence between critics of agricultural GMOs and people who make false claims about climate change, COVID-19, and vaccines. We examined their main claims on these GMOs—for example, that there is a scientific consensus that they are safe for health and the environment—in the light of the scientific evidence and public discussion on this topic. We found that their claims are biased and misleading and ignore or omit crucial evidence. We conclude that based on the evidence provided, Lynas et al. article can itself be classed as misinformation and could therefore mislead the general public as well as the scientific community.

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

Pollution

Reference155 articles.

1. Lynas M, Adams J, Conrow J (2022) Misinformation in the media: global coverage of GMOs 2019–2021. GM Crops & Food. https://doi.org/10.1080/21645698.2022.2140568

2. West JD, Bergstrom CT (2021) Misinformation in and about science. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 118:e1912444117. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1912444117

3. Swire-Thompson B, Lazer D (2020) Public health and online misinformation: challenges and recommendations. Annu Rev Publ Health 41:433–451. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-publhealth-040119-094127

4. Cambridge Dictionary (2023) Misinformation. In: dictionary.cambridge.org. https://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/misinformation. Accessed 21 May 2023

5. Wardle C, Derakhshan H (2017) Information disorder: Toward an interdisciplinary framework for research and policy making. Council of Europe, Strasbourg, France

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3