Author:
AlShafeey Mutaz,Saleh Saleh Mohamad Ali
Abstract
AbstractThis study examines the relationship between inflation and greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions in three major economies: the United States of America (USA), the European Union (EU), and China. The analysis spans from 1960 to 2021 for the USA and EU, and from 1971 to 2021 for China. A feedforward neural network model, optimized using the Levenberg–Marquardt backpropagation algorithm, was employed to predict GHG emissions based on annual inflation rates and fossil fuel energy consumption. The study integrates historical data on inflation trends with GHG emissions, measured in CO2 equivalents, and fossil fuel energy consumption, expressed as a percentage of total energy use. This multidimensional approach allows for a nuanced understanding of the economic-environmental interplay in these regions. Key findings indicate a nonlinear response of GHG emissions to inflation rates. In the USA, GHG emissions begin to decrease when inflation rates exceed 4.7%. Similarly, in the EU, a steep reduction in emissions is observed beyond a 7.5% inflation rate. China presents a more complex pattern, with two critical inflection points: the first at a 4.5% inflation rate, where GHG emissions start to decline sharply, and the second at a 7% inflation rate, beyond which further increases in inflation do not significantly reduce emissions. A critical global insight is the identification of a uniform inflation rate, around 4.4%, across all regions, at which GHG emissions consistently increase by 1%, hinting at a shared global economic behavior impacting the environment. This discovery is vital for policymakers, emphasizing the need for tailored regional strategies that consider unique economic structures, energy policies, and environmental regulations, alongside a coordinated global approach.
Funder
Corvinus University of Budapest
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference36 articles.
1. Ahmad M, Satrovic E (2023) How do fiscal policy, technological innovation, and economic openness expedite environmental sustainability? Gondwana Res 124:143–164
2. Dietz S, Stern N (2015) Endogenous growth, convexity of damage and climate risk: how Nordhaus’ framework supports deep cuts in carbon emissions. Econ J 125(583):574–620
3. Ollivier QR, Maher DT, Pitfield C, Macreadie PI (2022) Net drawdown of greenhouse gases (CO2, CH4 and N2O) by a temperate australian seagrass meadow. Estuaries Coasts 45(7):2026–2039
4. Ocko IB, Hamburg SP, Jacob DJ, Keith DW, Keohane NO, Oppenheimer M, Roy-Mayhew JD, Schrag DP, Pacala SW (2017) Unmask temporal trade-offs in climate policy debates. Science 356(6337):492–493
5. Merbold L, Decock C, Eugster W, Fuchs K, Wolf B, Buchmann N, Hörtnagl L (2020) Memory effects on greenhouse gas emissions (CO2, N2O and CH4) following grassland restoration? Biogeosciences discussions