Author:
Ilahi Nikhat,Bahadur Ali,Wang Wenyin,Degen A. Allan,Kang Shichang,Sajjad Wasim,Shang Zhanhuan
Abstract
Abstract
Background
Glaciers of the Hindu Kush region are highly susceptible to climate change. Recently, a severe glacial lake outburst flood (GLOF) hit the supraglacial region at the frontier of Dook Pal Glacier. Information on the bacterial community in a freshly appeared supraglacial lake after GLOF is essential to probe the bacterial distribution pattern after immediate unlocking from the supraglacial region. After GLOF, geochemistry and bacterial diversity, distribution, community structure, and function were examined in the lake-debris and melt-water.
Results
In general, concentrations of dissolved free amino acids were similar between lake-debris and melt-water, potentially toxic elements and cations were greater in lake-debris, and anions concentrations were greater in melt-water. In addition, there was comparable diversity in the glacial melt-water and lake-debris; Proteobacteria dominated in lake-debris (33.1–94.5%), while Proteobacteria (36.7–50.5%) and Firmicutes (44–62%) dominated in melt-water. It is more likely that Proteobacteria and Firmicutes shifted towards melt-water after GLOF, creating an uneven distribution of communities in the lake-debris; however, a relatively even distribution was maintained in melt-water. Genes responsible for metabolism and energy production were higher in lake-debris than in melt-water bacteria; whereas, genes for other cellular mechanisms were higher in melt-water than in lake-debris bacteria.
Conclusions
This study offers valuable datasets in understanding the bacterial diversity, distribution and function as a consequence of GLOF at the glacial frontier.
Funder
Natural Science Foundation of China
Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities
‘111’ Programme 2.0
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference70 articles.
1. Ohmura A (2014) Snow and ice in the climate system. In: Haeberli W, Whiteman C (eds) Snow and ice-related hazards, risks and disasters. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 77–98
2. Anesio AM, Laybourn-Parry J (2012) Glaciers and ice sheets as a biome. Trends Ecol Evol 27:219–225. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2011.09.012
3. Hodson A, Anesio AM, Tranter M, Fountain A, Osborn M, Priscu J, Laybourn-Parry J, Sattler B (2008) Glacial ecosystems. Ecol Monogr 78:41–67
4. Anesio AM, Lutz S, Chrismas NAM, Benning LG (2017) The microbiome of glaciers and ice sheets. NPJ Biofilms Microbiomes 3(1):1–11
5. Rafiq M, Hassan N, Hayat M, Ibrar M, Sajjad W, Haleem A, Maqsood-ur-Rehman M, Muhammad RA, Hasan F (2021) Geochemistry and insights into the distribution of biotechnological important fungi from the third pole of the world, Karakoram Mountains Range. Geomicrobiol J 38:395–403. https://doi.org/10.1080/01490451.2020.1863526
Cited by
5 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献