Abstract
AbstractCurrent approaches for the prospective regulatory assessment of chemicals do not account sufficiently for elevated mixture risks. The Mixture Assessment Factor (MAF, better labeled a Mixture Allocation Factor) has been suggested for mixtures of industrial chemicals in the EU’s Chemicals Strategy for Sustainability, as a pragmatic tool to account for potential mixture risks already during the risk and safety assessment of individual chemicals. The MAF is to be applied in scenarios in which specific mixture risk assessments are not possible, due to a lack of data and/or the complexity of the relevant exposure scenarios. Several approaches and algorithms for calculating a MAF have been suggested in the literature. The MAFexact, which is a member of the larger MAFceiling class, is defined as the maximum fraction of the risk quotient of each chemical that is still acceptable to occur in a mixture, without the sum of risk quotients exceeding 1. This paper provides a comparative overview of the different MAF types discussed in the literature. It argues that the MAFexact is the most promising approach in the context of chemical registration and authorization under regulatory frameworks such as REACH because this approach ensures a protection level that is similar to the protection level used in the current safety assessment of individual chemicals under REACH. Other MAF approaches either disproportionally impact low-risk substances, without leading to any appreciable risk reduction, or hamper risk communication because they lead to fluctuating residual risks after the MAF application. The paper also presents a case study comparing the different MAF approaches and finally discusses the MAF concept in the wider context of chemical regulation.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference35 articles.
1. Pronk TE et al (2021) A water quality index for the removal requirement and purification treatment effort of micropollutants. Water Supply 21:128–145
2. Wang A et al (2021) Suspect screening, prioritization, and confirmation of environmental chemicals in maternal-newborn pairs from San Francisco. Environ Sci Technol 55(8):5037–5049
3. Thrupp TJ, Runnalls TJ, Scholze M, Kugathas S, Kortenkamp A, Sumpter JP (2018) The consequences of exposure to mixtures of chemicals: Something from ‘nothing’ and ‘a lot from a little’ when fish are exposed to steroid hormones. Sci Total Environ 619–620:1482–1492. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.11.081
4. Conley JM, Lambright CS, Evans N, Cardon M, Medlock-Kakaley E, Wilson VS, Gray LE (2021) A mixture of 15 phthalates and pesticides below individual chemical no observed adverse effect levels (NOAELs) produces reproductive tract malformations in the male rat. Environ Int 156:106615. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2021.106615
5. Kortenkamp A, Backhaus T, Faust M (2009) State of the art review of mixture toxicity. Report to the Commission of the European Union (Directorate General for the Environment). http://ec.europa.eu/environment/chemicals/pdf/report_Mixture%20toxicity.pdf. Accessed 15 April 2023
Cited by
11 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献