Author:
Li Qiang,Cao Ying,Meng Tian,He Liansheng,Zhang Sen
Abstract
AbstractThe study of the contamination patterns and characteristics of Sb and As in the soils of the legacy contaminated sites of antimony smelters is important for the redevelopment and utilization of industrial sites. In this study, 13 heavy metals were determined in the soil and plants of an antimony smelter in Gansu Province to study the biogeochemical behavior, health risk, and pollution source. The results showed that the Nemerow index of Sb (728) exceeded the value of As (43.6) by 17.6 times, and the average geoaccumulation index (Igeo) of Sb and As were 10.1 and 1.97, respectively, categorized as extremely and moderately contaminated classes. Compared to As, Sb had a larger proportion of oxidizable fraction and a smaller proportion of reducible fraction (Fe/Mn oxides), suggesting that Sb possessed a higher content of organic matter and sulfide forms. Even though the bioaccumulation factor (BAF) for As was about 10 times higher than that for Sb, the accumulation of Sb in plants was not negligible. For the USEPA model, the mean hazard quotient (HQ) values of As by oral ingestion, dermal absorption, and inhalation accounted for 99.0%, 0.97%, and 0.0002% of the total, and 54.2%, 45.3%, and 0.51% for MEEPRC model, respectively. There were significant positive correlations between Sb, As, Zn, Se, Cd, and Ba (P < 0.05). The results of the source identification analysis revealed that antimony smelting, solid waste pollution, and natural origin were identified as the main pollution sources. The principal component analysis (PCA) and positive matrix factorization (PMF) methods differed by more than 20% in the analysis of the contribution of antimony smelting activities and solid waste pollution sources, suggesting the differences in the models themselves and in the uncertainty parameters chosen during the application.
Funder
National Key Research and Development Program of China
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference57 articles.
1. Agyeman PC, Kingsley J, Kebonye NM, Khosravi V, Borůvka L, Vašát R (2023) Prediction of the concentration of antimony in agricultural soil using data fusion, terrain attributes combined with regression kriging. Environ Pollut 316:120697
2. Bolan N, Kumar M, Singh E, Kumar A, Singh L, Kumar S, Keerthanan S, Hoang SA, El-Naggar A, Vithanage M, Sarkar B, Wijesekara H, Diyabalanage S, Sooriyakumar P, Vinu A, Wang H, Kirkham MB, Shaheen SM, Rinklebe J, Siddique KHM (2022) Antimony contamination and its risk management in complex environmental settings: a review. Environ Int 158:106908
3. Chen W, Xie T, Li X, Wang R (2018) Thinking of construction of soil pollution prevention and control technology system in China. Acta Pedol Sin 55:557–568
4. CMBQTS (2016) Soil screening levels for environmental risk assessment of sites. DB 50/ T 723–2016. Chongqing municipal bureau of quality and technical supervision, Chongqing
5. CNEMC (1990) The element background values of Chinese soil. China National Environmental Monitoring Centre, Beijing