A guide for social science journal editors on easing into open science-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

A guide for social science journal editors on easing into open science

Published:2024-02-16 Issue:1 Volume:9 Page:
ISSN:2058-8615
Container-title:Research Integrity and Peer Review
language:en
Short-container-title:Res Integr Peer Rev

Author:

Silverstein Priya^ORCID,Elman Colin^ORCID,Montoya Amanda^ORCID,McGillivray Barbara^ORCID,Pennington Charlotte R.^ORCID,Harrison Chase H.^ORCID,Steltenpohl Crystal N.^ORCID,Röer Jan Philipp^ORCID,Corker Katherine S.^ORCID,Charron Lisa M.^ORCID,Elsherif Mahmoud^ORCID,Malicki Mario^ORCID,Hayes-Harb Rachel^ORCID,Grinschgl Sandra^ORCID,Neal Tess^ORCID,Evans Thomas Rhys^ORCID,Karhulahti Veli-Matti^ORCID,Krenzer William L. D.^ORCID,Belaus Anabel^ORCID,Moreau David^ORCID,Burin Debora I.^ORCID,Chin Elizabeth^ORCID,Plomp Esther^ORCID,Mayo-Wilson Evan^ORCID,Lyle Jared^ORCID,Adler Jonathan M.^ORCID,Bottesini Julia G.^ORCID,Lawson Katherine M.^ORCID,Schmidt Kathleen^ORCID,Reneau Kyrani^ORCID,Vilhuber Lars^ORCID,Waltman Ludo^ORCID,Gernsbacher Morton Ann^ORCID,Plonski Paul E.^ORCID,Ghai Sakshi^ORCID,Grant Sean^ORCID,Christian Thu-Mai^ORCID,Ngiam William^ORCID,Syed Moin^ORCID

Abstract

AbstractJournal editors have a large amount of power to advance open science in their respective fields by incentivising and mandating open policies and practices at their journals. The Data PASS Journal Editors Discussion Interface (JEDI, an online community for social science journal editors: www.dpjedi.org) has collated several resources on embedding open science in journal editing (www.dpjedi.org/resources). However, it can be overwhelming as an editor new to open science practices to know where to start. For this reason, we created a guide for journal editors on how to get started with open science. The guide outlines steps that editors can take to implement open policies and practices within their journal, and goes through the what, why, how, and worries of each policy and practice. This manuscript introduces and summarizes the guide (full guide: https://doi.org/10.31219/osf.io/hstcx).

Funder

National Science Foundation

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Link

https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1186/s41073-023-00141-5.pdf

Reference117 articles.

1. Buckwalter W. The replication crisis and philosophy. PhiMiSci. 2022;3. Available from: https://philosophymindscience.org/index.php/phimisci/article/view/9193. Cited 2023 May 19.

2. Button KS, Ioannidis JPA, Mokrysz C, Nosek BA, Flint J, Robinson ESJ, et al. Power failure: why small sample size undermines the reliability of neuroscience. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2013;14(5):365–76.

3. Cook BG. A Call for Examining Replication and Bias in Special Education Research. Remedial Special Educ. 2014;35(4):233–46.

4. Farrar BG, Vernouillet A, Garcia-Pelegrin E, Legg E, Brecht K, Lambert P, et al. Reporting and interpreting non-significant results in animal cognition research. 2022.

5. Ioannidis JPA. Why Science Is Not Necessarily Self-Correcting. Perspect Psychol Sci. 2012;7(6):645–54.

Cited by 4 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Open science practices in criminology and criminal justice journals;Journal of Experimental Criminology;2024-09-12

2. Tactics of just, equitable, diverse, and inclusive scientific research;Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior;2024-08-19

3. Assessing the effects of a precommitment policy applied during peer review;Evidence-Based Toxicology;2024-08-19

4. Three Persistent Myths about Open Science;Journal of Trial and Error;2024-04-08