Author:
Holliday Judith,Jones Natalie,Cooke Jo
Abstract
AbstractThere is increasing focus to review the societal impact of research through assessment and research excellence frameworks. These often link to financial and reputational incentives within the academic community. However, timeframes to demonstrate impact using these approaches are often long and are not designed to show benefit to service collaborators who require evidence of improvement and change to their services more immediately. Impacts that are measured this way may also miss out on unintended and positive impacts that occur as by-products of research, or through the ‘ripple effect’ that research may have on practice. Importantly, demonstrating how research makes a difference can improve the research culture in services, and motivations in service partners to become, and stay involved in research. This article describes, and provides access to, a tool called VICTOR (making Visible the ImpaCT Of Research) that was developed by a community of practice involving 12 NHS organisations through blending evidence from the literature, practice and service users. We describe the types of impact that have been collected by VICTOR and explore how collecting impact in this way might help research-practice partnerships and inform research methodologies and may be useful to show impacts alongside, and shortly after the research process.
Funder
National Institute for Health Research Collaboration for Leadership in Applied Health Research and Care Yorkshire and Humber
NIHR Clinical Research Network Yorkshire and Humber
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
General Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology,General Medicine
Reference34 articles.
1. Department of Health. 2006 Best research for best health: a new national health research strategy London:: Department of Health; Available at https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/568772/dh_4127152_v2.pdf.
2. Department of Health and Social Care. 2020. Best Research for Best Health: the next chapter. London: Department of Health and Social Care. Available at https://www.nihr.ac.uk/documents/about-us/best-research-for-best-health-the-next-chapter.pdf.
3. Morris ZS, Wooding S, Grant J. The answer is 17 years, what is the question: understanding time lags in translational research. J R Soc Med. 2011;104(12):510–20.
4. Nutley S, Boaz A, Davies H, Fraser A. New development: what works now? Continuity and change in the use of evidence to improve public policy and service delivery. Public Money & Management. 2019;39(4):310–6.
5. van der Graaf P, Cheetham M, Redgate S, Humble C, Adamson A. Co-production in local government: process, codification and capacity building of new knowledge in collective reflection spaces. Workshops findings from a UK mixed methods study. Health Res Policy Syst. 2021;19(1):1–13.