Author:
Liu Chenhui,Song Zhanjie,Sang Yicun,He Gaiyun
Abstract
Abstract
The current researches mainly adopt “Guide to the expression of uncertainty in measurement (GUM)” to calculate the profile error. However, GUM can only be applied in the linear models. The standard GUM is not appropriate to calculate the uncertainty of profile error because the mathematical model of profile error is strongly non-linear. An improved second-order GUM method (GUMM) is proposed to calculate the uncertainty. At the same time, the uncertainties in different coordinate axes directions are calculated as the measuring points uncertainties. In addition, the correlations between variables could not be ignored while calculating the uncertainty. A k-factor conversion method is proposed to calculate the converge factor due to the unknown and asymmetrical distribution of the output quantity. Subsequently, the adaptive Monte Carlo method (AMCM) is used to evaluate whether the second-order GUMM is better. Two practical examples are listed and the conclusion is drawn by comparing and discussing the second-order GUMM and AMCM. The results show that the difference between the improved second-order GUM and the AMCM is smaller than the difference between the standard GUM and the AMCM. The improved second-order GUMM is more precise in consideration of the nonlinear mathematical model of profile error.
Funder
National Natural Science Foundation of China
National Science and Technology Major Project of China
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering,Mechanical Engineering
Reference30 articles.
1. Y Li, P Gu. Free-form surface inspection techniques state of the art review. Computer-Aided Design, 2004, 36(13): 1395-1417.
2. F Liu, G Xu, L Liang, et al. Least squares evaluations for form and profile errors of ellipse using coordinate data. Chinese Journal of Mechanical Engineering, 2016, 29(5): 1020-1028.
3. X Q Lei, Z B Gao, J W Cui, et al. The minimum zone evaluation for elliptical profile error based on the geometry optimal approximation algorithm. Measurement, 2015, 75: 284-288.
4. S Zhaoyao. Profile deviation evaluation of large gears based on NURBS surface fitting. Chinese Journal of Scientific Instrument, 2016, 37(3): 533-539.
5. X Yang, X L Liu, J M Liu, et al. Matching algorithm for profile error calculation of blade surface. Advanced Materials Research, 2016, 1136: 630-635.
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献