Abstract
Abstract
Purpose
In positron emission tomography quantification, multiple pharmacokinetic parameters are typically estimated from each time activity curve. Conventionally all but the parameter of interest are discarded before performing subsequent statistical analysis. However, we assert that these discarded parameters also contain relevant information which can be exploited to improve the precision and power of statistical analyses on the parameter of interest. Properly taking this into account can thereby draw more informative conclusions without collecting more data.
Methods
By applying a hierarchical multifactor multivariate Bayesian approach, all estimated parameters from all regions can be analysed at once. We refer to this method as Parameters undergoing Multivariate Bayesian Analysis (PuMBA). We simulated patient–control studies with different radioligands, varying sample sizes and measurement error to explore its performance, comparing the precision, statistical power, false positive rate and bias of estimated group differences relative to univariate analysis methods.
Results
We show that PuMBA improves the statistical power for all examined applications relative to univariate methods without increasing the false positive rate. PuMBA improves the precision of effect size estimation, and reduces the variation of these estimates between simulated samples. Furthermore, we show that PuMBA yields performance improvements even in the presence of substantial measurement error. Remarkably, owing to its ability to leverage information shared between pharmacokinetic parameters, PuMBA even shows greater power than conventional univariate analysis of the true binding values from which the parameters were simulated. Across all applications, PuMBA exhibited a small degree of bias in the estimated outcomes; however, this was small relative to the variation in estimated outcomes between simulated datasets.
Conclusion
PuMBA improves the precision and power of statistical analysis of PET data without requiring the collection of additional measurements. This makes it possible to study new research questions in both new and previously collected data. PuMBA therefore holds great promise for the field of PET imaging.
Funder
NIH Blueprint for Neuroscience Research
Hjärnfonden
Vetenskapsrådet
Karolinska Institute
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and imaging,Instrumentation,Biomedical Engineering,Radiation
Reference39 articles.
1. Bates D, Mächler M, Bolker B, et al. Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. J Stat Softw. 2015;67(1):1–48. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v067.i01.
2. Wiley series in probability and statistics;DA Belsley,1991
3. Betancourt M. Hierarchical modeling. 2020a; Retrieved from https://github.com/betanalpha/knitr_case_studies, commit 27c1d260e9ceca710465dc3b02f59f59b729ca43.
4. Betancourt M. Towards a principled bayesian workflow (RStan). 2020b; Retrieved from https://github.com/betanalpha/knitr_case_studies, commit aeab31509b8e37ff05b0828f87a3018b1799b401.
5. Betancourt M. Factor modeling. 2021; Retrieved from https://github.com/betanalpha/ knitr_case_studies, commit 6e4566309163ee79f8b7c907e2efce969a96bc54.
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献