Author:
Pan Bolin,Marsden Paul K.,Reader Andrew J.
Abstract
Abstract
Background
Multiplexed positron emission tomography (mPET) imaging can measure physiological and pathological information from different tracers simultaneously in a single scan. Separation of the multiplexed PET signals within a single PET scan is challenging due to the fact that each tracer gives rise to indistinguishable 511 keV photon pairs, and thus no unique energy information for differentiating the source of each photon pair.
Methods
Recently, many applications of deep learning for mPET image separation have been concentrated on pure data-driven methods, e.g., training a neural network to separate mPET images into single-tracer dynamic/static images. These methods use over-parameterized networks with only a very weak inductive prior. In this work, we improve the inductive prior of the deep network by incorporating a general kinetic model based on spectral analysis. The model is incorporated, along with deep networks, into an unrolled image-space version of an iterative fully 4D PET reconstruction algorithm.
Results
The performance of the proposed method was evaluated on a simulated brain image dataset for dual-tracer [$$^{18}$$
18
F]FDG+[$$^{11}$$
11
C]MET PET image separation. The results demonstrate that the proposed method can achieve separation performance comparable to that obtained with single-tracer imaging. In addition, the proposed method outperformed the model-based separation methods (the conventional voxel-wise multi-tracer compartment modeling method (v-MTCM) and the image-space dual-tracer version of the fully 4D PET image reconstruction algorithm (IS-F4D)), as well as a pure data-driven separation [using a convolutional encoder-decoder (CED)], with fewer training examples.
Conclusions
This work proposes a kinetic model-informed unrolled deep learning method for mPET image separation. In simulation studies, the method proved able to outperform both the conventional v-MTCM method and a pure data-driven CED with less training data.
Funder
Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council
Wellcome EPSRC Centre for Medical Engineering
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference58 articles.
1. Kadrmas DJ, Rust TC. Feasibility of rapid multitracer PET tumor imaging. IEEE Trans Nucl Sci. 2005;52(5):1341–7.
2. Black NF, McJames S, Rust TC, Kadrmas DJ. Evaluation of rapid dual-tracer 62Cu-PTSM+62Cu-ATSM PET in dogs with spontaneously occurring tumors. Phys Med Biol. 2007;53(1):217.
3. Cook GJ. Normal variants, artifacts and interpretative pitfalls in PET imaging with 18-fluoro-2-deoxyglucose and carbon-11 methionine. Eur J Nucl Med. 1999;26:1363–79.
4. Chung JK, Kim Y, Kim SK, Lee Y, Paek S, Yeo J, Jeong J, Lee D, Jung H, Lee M. Usefulness of 11C-methionine PET in the evaluation of brain lesions that are hypo- or isometabolic on 18F-FDG PET. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2002;29:176–82.
5. Huang SC, Carson RE, Hoffman EJ, Kuhl DE, Phelps ME. An investigation of a double-tracer technique for positron computerized tomography. J Nucl Med. 1982;23(9):816–22.