Abstract
Abstract
Background
The wild boar (Sus scrofa) was extinct in Sweden when a few animals established in the 1970s. Over the past 35 years, the species has made a substantial comeback. In this paper, we analyse wild boar population growth using three indices of population size. We also map the legislative decisions and research prompted by the expanding population. We discuss to what extent, in the eyes of the state, the view of wild boar and the management focus has shifted over time, from a perceived pest (eradication) to scarce (conservation), overabundant (reduction/control) or somewhere in between (sustainable management).
Results
Wild boar harvest started in the early 1990s with a few hundred animals annually and peaked at 161,000 in 2020/2021. The distribution now comprises most of southern Sweden. Analyses of harvest and traffic accidents involving wild boar showed that the population grew exponentially until 2010/2011, after which the increase levelled off. Thus, logistic growth models showed the best fit for the full study period. We recorded 38 legislative decisions or commissions to government agencies regarding wild boar. The first decision in 1981 was to eradicate the free-ranging population. In 1987 however, the parliament decided that wild boar is native to Sweden and should be allowed in restricted extent. Later decisions mainly concerned hunting regulations and hunting methods as direct means to increase harvest and regulate the population. Another topic, increasing in importance over time, was to facilitate the use of wild boar meat to indirectly stimulate harvest. A local outbreak of African swine fever in 2023 necessitated a stamping out strategy in the affected area. We found 44 scientific papers regarding the present free-ranging population. Topics include movements and feeding patterns, hunting, reproduction, and population development.
Conclusions
The state historically regarded wild boar as a pest to be eradicated. This changed with the decision that wild boar should be allowed in restricted extent, suggesting a conservation approach. In response to population growth, the focus shifted to means facilitating sustainable management and, lately, reducing growth. The story of wild boar in Sweden illustrates attempts to mitigate conflicts and balance interests in wildlife management.
Funder
Swedish Association for Hunting and Wildlife Management
Norwegian Institute for Nature Research
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference99 articles.
1. WWF. Living Planet Report 2020 – Bending the curve of biodiversity loss. Almond REA, Grooten M, Petersen T editors. WWF, Gland, Switzerland. ISBN 978-2-940529-99-5.
2. Maxwell SL, Fuller RA, Brooks TM, Watson JEM, Biodiversity. The ravages of guns, nets and bulldozers. Nature. 2016;536:143–5. https://doi.org/10.1038/536143a.
3. IPBES. Summary for policymakers of the global assessment report on biodiversity and ecosystem services of the Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services. Díaz S, Settele J, Brondízio ES, Ngo HT, Guèze M, Agard J, et al. editors. IPBES secretariat, Bonn, Germany 2019;56 pp. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3553579.
4. OECD. The Political Economy of Biodiversity Policy Reform. OECD Publishing Paris. 2017. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264269545-en.
5. Bomford M, O´Brien P. Eradication or control for vertebrate pests? Wildl Soc B. 1995;23(2):249–55. https://www.jstor.org/stable/3782799.