Abstract
Abstract
Background
Knowledge about home range size is vital to understand social systems and population dynamics of small mammals, as well as dispersal and a species’ landscape use. Home ranges have been mapped for some species of voles (subfamily Microtinae) but remain virtually unknown for many species, including the grey-sided vole Craseomys rufocanus.
Results
A small pilot study was carried out in an inland valley of northern Norway, where six adult C. rufocanus were radio-tracked with one male and one female in each of the summers 2021–2023. Despite the small sample size, a large variation in home range size was found; males 2 294 − 36 887 m2 and females 1 728-7 392 m2 (100% MCP). Three of the voles tracked over a prolonged period of time showed a dynamic use and shifting of the range. Home range size and use was mostly related to reproduction. The male with the smallest range had probably not yet become reproductively active, whereas the male with the largest range was searching for females at a time when vole density was very low. The third male reduced his range when the reproductive season ended. For females the most important limitations were food, shelter and dependent young, those with young needed to return frequently and spend more time at the nest site. When the reproductive season ended, one female increased her range, perhaps exploring sites to overwinter.
Conclusions
Home range use in this population appears to be more dynamic than has previously been reported for C. rufocanus. The large ranges of males most likely resulted from the search of reproductively active females, outside of the reproductive season male ranges approximated female ranges. Female ranges most likely were limited by the need to feed close to their nest with dependent young, being able to roam more freely when reproduction ended.
Funder
UiT The Arctic University of Norway
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference36 articles.
1. McNab BK. Ecological and behavioral consequences of adaptation to various food resources. In: Eisenberg JF, Kleiman DG, editors. Advances in the study of mammalian behavior. Special publication no. 7, The American Society of Mammalogists; 1983. p 664–697. https://doi.org/10.4962/bhl.title.39511.
2. Andreassen HP, Ims RA, Stenseth NChr,Yoccoz NG. Investigating space use by means of radiotelemetry and other methods: a methodological guide. Pp. 589–618 in Stenseth NChr, Ims RA, editors. The biology of lemmings. Linnean Society Symposium Series No. 15. London: Academic Press, London; 1993.
3. Burt WH. Territoriality and home range concepts as applied to mammals. J Mammal. 1943;24:346–52. https://doi.org/10.2307/1374834.
4. Hayne DW. Calculation of size of home range. J Mammal. 1949;30:1–18.
5. Bondrup-Nielsen S, Karlsson F. Movements and spatial patterns in populations of Clethrionomys species: a review. Ann Zool Fennici. 1985;22:385–92.