Abstract
Abstract
Background
A dramatic decline in mental health of people worldwide in the early COVID-19 pandemic years has not recovered. In rural and remote Australia, access to appropriate and timely mental health services has been identified as a major barrier to people seeking help for mental ill-health. From 2020 to 2021 a care navigation model, Navicare, was co-designed with rural and remote communities in the Greater Whitsunday Region of Central Queensland in Australia. The Exploration, Preparation, Implementation and Sustainment (EPIS) framework was used to design and guide multiple aspects of a multisite study, The Bridging Study, to evaluate the implementation of Navicare in Australia.
Methods
A community-engaged hybrid effectiveness-implementation study design will focus on the tailored implementation of Navicare at three new sites as well as monitoring implementation at an existing site established since 2021. Study outcomes assessed will include sustained access as the co-primary outcome (measured using access to Navicare mental health referral services) and Proctor’s Implementation Outcomes of feasibility, acceptability, appropriateness, adoption, fidelity, implementation cost, and sustainability. Data collection for the implementation evaluation will include service usage data, community consultations, interviews, and workshops; analysed using mixed methods and guided by EPIS and other implementation frameworks. Pre-post effectiveness and cost-consequence study components are embedded in the implementation and sustainment phases, with comparison to pre-implementation data and value assessed for each EPIS phase using hospital, service, and resource allocation data. A scaling up strategy will be co-developed using a national roundtable forum in the final year of the study. Qualitative exploration of other aspects of the study (e.g., mechanisms of action and stakeholder engagement) will be conducted.
Discussion
Our study will use tailoring to local sites and a community-engaged approach to drive implementation of a mental health care navigation service in rural and remote Australia, with expected benefits to mental healthcare access. This approach is consistent with policy recommendations nationally and internationally as building blocks for rural health including the World Health Organization Framework for Action on Strengthening Health Systems to Improve Health Outcomes.
Trial registration
Prospectively registered on April 2, 2024, on the Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry, no. ACTRN12624000382572.
https://anzctr.org.au/Trial/Registration/TrialReview.aspx?id=386665&isReview=true.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference69 articles.
1. Sapien Labs. The Mental State of the World in 2023: A persepctive in Internet-Enabled Populations. 2024. https://mentalstateoftheworld.report/2023_read/.
2. Australian Institute of Health and Welfare, Australian Government. Australian Burden of Disease Study 2023. Canberra; 2023. https://www.aihw.gov.au/reports/burden-of-disease/australian-burden-of-disease-study-2023/contents/summary. Accessed 27 May 2024.
3. Australian Bureau of Statistics. National Study of Mental Health and Wellbeing. Canberra; 2023. https://www.abs.gov.au/statistics/health/mental-health/national-study-mental-health-and-wellbeing/2020-2022. Accessed 27 May 2024.
4. Australian Institute of Health and Welfare. Rural & Remote Australians. Australian Institute of Health and Welfare website; 2024. https://www.aihw.gov.au/reports-data/population-groups/rural-remote-australians/links-other-information#:~:text=The%20term%20'rural%20and%20remote,regional%2C%20Remote%20or%20Very%20remote. Accessed 27 May 2024.
5. Perkins D, Farmer J, Salvador-Carulla L, Dalton H, Luscombe G. The Orange Declaration on rural and remote mental health. Aust J Rural Health. 2019;27(5):374–9. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajr.12560.